Journal Article

Genetic diversity among cultivated beets (Beta vulgaris) assessed via population-based whole genome sequences

Galewski, Paul, McGrath, J. Mitchell

2020

Overview

Background Diversification on the basis of utilization is a hallmark of Beta vulgaris (beet), as well as other crop species. Often, crop improvement and management activities are segregated by crop type, thus preserving unique genome diversity and organization. Full interfertility is typically retained in crosses between these groups and more traits may be accessible if the genetic basis of crop type lineage were known, along with available genetic markers to effect efficient transfer (e.g., via backcrossing). Beta vulgaris L. (2n =18) is a species complex composed of diverged lineages (e.g., crop types), including the familiar table, leaf (chard), fodder, and sugar beet crop types. Using population genetic and statistical methods with whole genome sequence data from pooled samples of 23 beet cultivars and breeding lines, relationships were determined between accessions based on identity-by-state metrics and shared genetic variation among lineages. Results Distribution of genetic variation within and between crop types showed extensive shared (e.g. non-unique) genetic variation. Lineage specific variation (e.g. apomorphy) within crop types supported a shared demographic history within each crop type, while principal components analysis revealed strong crop type differentiation. Relative contributions of specific chromosomes to genome wide differentiation were ascertained, with each chromosome revealing a different pattern of differentiation with respect to crop type. Inferred population size history for each crop type helped integrate selection history for each lineage, and highlighted potential genetic bottlenecks in the development of cultivated beet lineages. Conclusions A complex evolutionary history of cultigroups in Beta vulgaris was demonstrated, involving lineage divergence as a result of selection and reproductive isolation. Clear delineation of crop types was obfuscated by historical gene flow and common ancestry (e.g. admixture and introgression, and sorting of ancestral polymorphism) which served to share genome variation between crop types and, likely, important phenotypic characters. Table beet was well differentiated as a crop type, and shared more genetic variation within than among crop types. The sugar beet group was not quite as well differentiated as the table beet group. Fodder and chard groups were intermediate between table and sugar groups, perhaps the result of less intensive selection for end use.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Adaptation / Analysis / Animal feeding and feeds / Animal Genetics and Genomics / Apomorphy / Beets / Beta vulgaris / Biodiversity / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Cell division / Chard / Chromosomes / Crop diseases / Crop improvement / Cultivars / Distribution / Fodder beet / Forage / Gene sequencing / Genes / Genetic aspects / Genetic diversity / Genetic markers / Genetic polymorphisms / Genetic research / Genome wide analysis / Genomes / Genomics / Identity / Isolation / Leaf beet / Life Sciences / Measurement / Microarrays / Microbial Genetics and Genomics / Plant Genetics and Genomics / Plant genomics / Population / Population number / Principal components analysis / Proteomics / Research Article / Statistical methods / Sucrose / Sugar / Sugar beet / Table beet / Whole genome sequencing