Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Ultrasound guidance in difficult radial artery puncture for blood gas analysis: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
by
Muller, Laurent
, Pommet, Stéphane
, Genre Grandpierre, Romain
, Markarian, Thibaut
, Occéan, Bob-Valéry
, Roger, Claire
, Lefrant, Jean Yves
, de la Coussaye, Jean Emmanuel
, Bobbia, Xavier
, Claret, Pierre-Géraud
in
Aged
/ Anesthesiology
/ Arteries
/ Biology and Life Sciences
/ Blood
/ Blood Gas Analysis
/ Blood Specimen Collection - adverse effects
/ Blood Specimen Collection - methods
/ Catheterization, Peripheral - methods
/ Clinical trials
/ Critical care
/ Emergency medical care
/ Female
/ Gas analysis
/ Hospitals
/ Humans
/ Intensive care
/ Intubation
/ Life Sciences
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Middle Aged
/ Nurses
/ Pain
/ Pain - etiology
/ Pain Measurement
/ Patient Satisfaction
/ Patients
/ Penetrating wounds
/ People and Places
/ Physical Sciences
/ Physicians
/ Prospective Studies
/ Punctures - adverse effects
/ Punctures - methods
/ Radial Artery - diagnostic imaging
/ Randomization
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Risk
/ Sepsis
/ Systematic review
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Ultrasonic imaging
/ Ultrasonography, Interventional
/ Ultrasound
/ Veins & arteries
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Ultrasound guidance in difficult radial artery puncture for blood gas analysis: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
by
Muller, Laurent
, Pommet, Stéphane
, Genre Grandpierre, Romain
, Markarian, Thibaut
, Occéan, Bob-Valéry
, Roger, Claire
, Lefrant, Jean Yves
, de la Coussaye, Jean Emmanuel
, Bobbia, Xavier
, Claret, Pierre-Géraud
in
Aged
/ Anesthesiology
/ Arteries
/ Biology and Life Sciences
/ Blood
/ Blood Gas Analysis
/ Blood Specimen Collection - adverse effects
/ Blood Specimen Collection - methods
/ Catheterization, Peripheral - methods
/ Clinical trials
/ Critical care
/ Emergency medical care
/ Female
/ Gas analysis
/ Hospitals
/ Humans
/ Intensive care
/ Intubation
/ Life Sciences
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Middle Aged
/ Nurses
/ Pain
/ Pain - etiology
/ Pain Measurement
/ Patient Satisfaction
/ Patients
/ Penetrating wounds
/ People and Places
/ Physical Sciences
/ Physicians
/ Prospective Studies
/ Punctures - adverse effects
/ Punctures - methods
/ Radial Artery - diagnostic imaging
/ Randomization
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Risk
/ Sepsis
/ Systematic review
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Ultrasonic imaging
/ Ultrasonography, Interventional
/ Ultrasound
/ Veins & arteries
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Ultrasound guidance in difficult radial artery puncture for blood gas analysis: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
by
Muller, Laurent
, Pommet, Stéphane
, Genre Grandpierre, Romain
, Markarian, Thibaut
, Occéan, Bob-Valéry
, Roger, Claire
, Lefrant, Jean Yves
, de la Coussaye, Jean Emmanuel
, Bobbia, Xavier
, Claret, Pierre-Géraud
in
Aged
/ Anesthesiology
/ Arteries
/ Biology and Life Sciences
/ Blood
/ Blood Gas Analysis
/ Blood Specimen Collection - adverse effects
/ Blood Specimen Collection - methods
/ Catheterization, Peripheral - methods
/ Clinical trials
/ Critical care
/ Emergency medical care
/ Female
/ Gas analysis
/ Hospitals
/ Humans
/ Intensive care
/ Intubation
/ Life Sciences
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Middle Aged
/ Nurses
/ Pain
/ Pain - etiology
/ Pain Measurement
/ Patient Satisfaction
/ Patients
/ Penetrating wounds
/ People and Places
/ Physical Sciences
/ Physicians
/ Prospective Studies
/ Punctures - adverse effects
/ Punctures - methods
/ Radial Artery - diagnostic imaging
/ Randomization
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Risk
/ Sepsis
/ Systematic review
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Ultrasonic imaging
/ Ultrasonography, Interventional
/ Ultrasound
/ Veins & arteries
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Ultrasound guidance in difficult radial artery puncture for blood gas analysis: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
Journal Article
Ultrasound guidance in difficult radial artery puncture for blood gas analysis: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Ultrasound (US) guidance has yet to prove its applicability in radial arterial blood gas analysis (ABGA) punctures. The main objective of our study was to compare the number of first-attempt successes (NFAS) for radial arterial puncture in difficult patients with or without US guidance. The Secondary aims were to compare the number of punctures (NOP), puncture time, and patient pain.
In this single-center, randomized controlled trial, patients who required a radial ABGA and in whom the arterial puncture was assessed as difficult (because of non-palpable radial arteries or two previous puncture failures by a nurse) were assigned to the US group or no-US (NUS) group (procedure performed by a trained physician).
Thirty-six patients were included in the US group and 37 in the NUS groups. The NFAS was 7 (19%) in the NUS group and 19 (53%) in the US group. The relative risk of success in the US group was 2.79 (95% CI,1.34 to 5.82), p = 0.01. In the NUS and US groups, respectively, the median NOP was 3 [2; 6] vs. 1 [1; 2], estimated difference -2.0 (95%CI, -3.4 to -0.6), p < 0.01; the respective puncture time was 3.1 [1.6; 5.4] vs. 1.4 [0.6; 3.1] min, estimated difference -1.45 (95%CI, -2.57 to -0.39), p = 0.01; the respective median patient pain was 6 [4; 8] vs. 2 [1; 4], estimated difference -4.0 (95%CI, -5.8 to -2.3); p < 0.01.
US guidance by a trained physician significantly improves the rate of success in difficult radial ABGA patients.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
/ Arteries
/ Blood
/ Blood Specimen Collection - adverse effects
/ Blood Specimen Collection - methods
/ Catheterization, Peripheral - methods
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Nurses
/ Pain
/ Patients
/ Radial Artery - diagnostic imaging
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Risk
/ Sepsis
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.