Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Contact tracing versus facility-based screening for active TB case finding in rural South Africa: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (Kharitode TB)
by
Nonyane, Bareng A. S.
, Martinson, Neil
, West, Nora S.
, Lebina, Limakatso
, Dowdy, David W.
, Mmolawa, Lesego
, Siwelana, Tsundzukani
, Hanrahan, Colleen F.
in
Adolescent
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ Ambulatory Care Facilities
/ Analysis
/ Care and treatment
/ Case studies
/ Child
/ Child, Preschool
/ Clinical trials
/ Clinics
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Contact tracing
/ Contact Tracing - methods
/ Diagnosis
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Funding
/ Health care access
/ Health screening
/ Historical account
/ HIV
/ Households
/ Human immunodeficiency virus
/ Humans
/ Low income groups
/ Male
/ Mass Screening - methods
/ Medical laboratories
/ Middle Aged
/ Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation & purification
/ Patients
/ Poisson density functions
/ Population
/ Program Evaluation
/ Public health
/ Rural areas
/ Rural Population - statistics & numerical data
/ South Africa - epidemiology
/ Sputum
/ Sputum - microbiology
/ Studies
/ Supervision
/ Tuberculosis
/ Tuberculosis - diagnosis
/ Tuberculosis - epidemiology
/ Ultrasonic testing
/ Young Adult
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Contact tracing versus facility-based screening for active TB case finding in rural South Africa: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (Kharitode TB)
by
Nonyane, Bareng A. S.
, Martinson, Neil
, West, Nora S.
, Lebina, Limakatso
, Dowdy, David W.
, Mmolawa, Lesego
, Siwelana, Tsundzukani
, Hanrahan, Colleen F.
in
Adolescent
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ Ambulatory Care Facilities
/ Analysis
/ Care and treatment
/ Case studies
/ Child
/ Child, Preschool
/ Clinical trials
/ Clinics
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Contact tracing
/ Contact Tracing - methods
/ Diagnosis
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Funding
/ Health care access
/ Health screening
/ Historical account
/ HIV
/ Households
/ Human immunodeficiency virus
/ Humans
/ Low income groups
/ Male
/ Mass Screening - methods
/ Medical laboratories
/ Middle Aged
/ Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation & purification
/ Patients
/ Poisson density functions
/ Population
/ Program Evaluation
/ Public health
/ Rural areas
/ Rural Population - statistics & numerical data
/ South Africa - epidemiology
/ Sputum
/ Sputum - microbiology
/ Studies
/ Supervision
/ Tuberculosis
/ Tuberculosis - diagnosis
/ Tuberculosis - epidemiology
/ Ultrasonic testing
/ Young Adult
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Contact tracing versus facility-based screening for active TB case finding in rural South Africa: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (Kharitode TB)
by
Nonyane, Bareng A. S.
, Martinson, Neil
, West, Nora S.
, Lebina, Limakatso
, Dowdy, David W.
, Mmolawa, Lesego
, Siwelana, Tsundzukani
, Hanrahan, Colleen F.
in
Adolescent
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ Ambulatory Care Facilities
/ Analysis
/ Care and treatment
/ Case studies
/ Child
/ Child, Preschool
/ Clinical trials
/ Clinics
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Contact tracing
/ Contact Tracing - methods
/ Diagnosis
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Funding
/ Health care access
/ Health screening
/ Historical account
/ HIV
/ Households
/ Human immunodeficiency virus
/ Humans
/ Low income groups
/ Male
/ Mass Screening - methods
/ Medical laboratories
/ Middle Aged
/ Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation & purification
/ Patients
/ Poisson density functions
/ Population
/ Program Evaluation
/ Public health
/ Rural areas
/ Rural Population - statistics & numerical data
/ South Africa - epidemiology
/ Sputum
/ Sputum - microbiology
/ Studies
/ Supervision
/ Tuberculosis
/ Tuberculosis - diagnosis
/ Tuberculosis - epidemiology
/ Ultrasonic testing
/ Young Adult
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Contact tracing versus facility-based screening for active TB case finding in rural South Africa: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (Kharitode TB)
Journal Article
Contact tracing versus facility-based screening for active TB case finding in rural South Africa: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (Kharitode TB)
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
There is a dearth of comparative effectiveness research examining the implementation of different strategies for active tuberculosis (TB) case finding, particularly in rural settings, which represent 60% of the population of sub-Saharan Africa.
We conducted a pragmatic, cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial of two TB case finding strategies (facility-based screening and contact tracing) in 56 public primary care clinics in two largely rural districts of Limpopo Province, South Africa. In the facility-based screening arm, sputum Xpert MTB/RIF was performed on all patients presenting (for any reason) with TB symptoms to 28 study clinics, and no contact tracing was performed. In the contact-tracing arm, contacts of patients with active TB were identified (via household tracing in 14 clinics and using small monetary incentives in the other 14 clinics), screened for TB symptoms, and offered Xpert MTB/RIF testing. The primary outcome was the number of newly identified patients with TB started on treatment. The analysis used multivariable Poisson regression adjusted for historical clinic-level TB case volumes and district. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02808507). From July 18, 2017, to January 17, 2019, a total of 3,755 individuals started TB treatment across 56 study clinics in the 18-month period. Clinic characteristics and clinic-level averages of patient characteristics were similar across the two arms: 40/56 (71%) clinics were in a rural location, 2,136/3,655 (58%) patients were male, and 2,243 (61%) were HIV positive. The treatment initiation ratio comparing the yield of TB patients started on treatment in the facility-based arm compared to that from the contact-tracing arm was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.30, p = 0. 73). In the contact-tracing arm, 1,677 contacts of 788 new TB index patients were screened, yielding 12 new patients with TB. Prespecified subgroup analyses resulted in similar results, with estimated treatment initiation ratios of 0.96 (95% CI 0.64-1.27; p = 0.78) and 1.23 (95% CI 0.87-1.59; p = 0.29) among historically smaller and historically larger clinics, respectively. This ratio was 1.02 (95% CI 0.66-1.37; p = 0.93) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.74-1.42; p = 0.68) in the Vhembe and Waterberg districts, respectively. The estimated treatment initiation ratio was unchanged in sensitivity analyses excluding 24 records whose TB registration numbers could not be verified (1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.29; p = 0.78) and excluding transfers-in (1.02, 95% CI 0.80-1.29; p = 0.71). Study limitations include the possibility of imbalance on cluster size owing to changes in catchment population over time and the inability to distinguish the independent effects of the two contact investigation strategies.
Contact tracing based on symptom screening and Xpert MTB/RIF testing did not increase the rate of treatment initiation for TB relative to the less resource-intensive approach of facility-based screening in this rural sub-Saharan setting.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02808507.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.