Journal Article

Automatic assessment of laparoscopic surgical skill competence based on motion metrics

Lingbo, Yan, Tsujita, Teppei, Hotta, Kiyohiko, Shinohara, Nobuo, Kurashima, Yo, Sase, Kazuya, Higuchi, Madoka, Miyaji, Kou, Abe, Takashige, Matsumoto, Ryuji, Chen, Xiaoshuai, Iwahara, Naoya, Murai, Sachiyo, Komizunai, Shunsuke, Furumido, Jun, Konno, Atsushi, Ebina, Koki, Kon, Masafumi, Shibuya, Sayaka, Kikuchi, Hiroshi, Osawa, Takahiro

2022

Overview

The purpose of this study was to characterize the motion features of surgical devices associated with laparoscopic surgical competency and build an automatic skill-credential system in porcine cadaver organ simulation training. Participants performed tissue dissection around the aorta, dividing vascular pedicles after applying Hem-o-lok (tissue dissection task) and parenchymal closure of the kidney (suturing task). Movements of surgical devices were tracked by a motion capture (Mocap) system, and Mocap-metrics were compared according to the level of surgical experience (experts: ≥50 laparoscopic surgeries, intermediates: 10–49, novices: 0–9), using the Kruskal-Wallis test and principal component analysis (PCA). Three machine-learning algorithms: support vector machine (SVM), PCA-SVM, and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), were utilized for discrimination of the surgical experience level. The accuracy of each model was evaluated by nested and repeated k-fold cross-validation. A total of 32 experts, 18 intermediates, and 20 novices participated in the present study. PCA revealed that efficiency-related metrics (e.g., path length) significantly contributed to PC 1 in both tasks. Regarding PC 2, speed-related metrics (e.g., velocity, acceleration, jerk) of right-hand devices largely contributed to the tissue dissection task, while those of left-hand devices did in the suturing task. Regarding the three-group discrimination, in the tissue dissection task, the GBDT method was superior to the other methods (median accuracy: 68.6%). In the suturing task, SVM and PCA-SVM methods were superior to the GBDT method (57.4 and 58.4%, respectively). Regarding the two-group discrimination (experts vs. intermediates/novices), the GBDT method resulted in a median accuracy of 72.9% in the tissue dissection task, and, in the suturing task, the PCA-SVM method resulted in a median accuracy of 69.2%. Overall, the mocap-based credential system using machine-learning classifiers provides a correct judgment rate of around 70% (two-group discrimination). Together with motion analysis and wet-lab training, simulation training could be a practical method for objectively assessing the surgical competence of trainees.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Acceleration / Algorithms / Aorta / Apprenticeship / Cameras / Coronary vessels / Data collection / Data mining / Decision trees / Devices / Dissection / Endoscopy / Evaluation / Intermediates / Kidneys / Laparoscopic surgery / Laparoscopy / Learning algorithms / Machine learning / Methods / Model accuracy / Motion capture / Principal components analysis / Simulation / Skills / Strain gauges / Study and teaching / Support vector machines / Surgery / Surgical apparatus & instruments / Sutures / Tissues / Training