Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Quantitative Measurement of Regret Theory
by
Cillo, Alessandra
, Bleichrodt, Han
, Diecidue, Enrico
in
Ambivalence
/ Analysis
/ Applied sciences
/ Convexity
/ Decision making
/ Decision theory
/ decision under uncertainty
/ Economic uncertainty
/ Exact sciences and technology
/ Management
/ Management principles
/ Management science
/ Measurement
/ Measurement techniques
/ Measures
/ Operational research and scientific management
/ Operational research. Management science
/ Prospect theory
/ Quantitative analysis
/ Regret
/ Regret theory
/ Reliability
/ Reliability theory. Replacement problems
/ Risk aversion
/ Stimuli
/ Studies
/ Theory
/ Transitivity
/ Uncertainty
/ Utility functions
/ utility measurement
/ Utility theory
/ Valence
/ Violations
2010
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Quantitative Measurement of Regret Theory
by
Cillo, Alessandra
, Bleichrodt, Han
, Diecidue, Enrico
in
Ambivalence
/ Analysis
/ Applied sciences
/ Convexity
/ Decision making
/ Decision theory
/ decision under uncertainty
/ Economic uncertainty
/ Exact sciences and technology
/ Management
/ Management principles
/ Management science
/ Measurement
/ Measurement techniques
/ Measures
/ Operational research and scientific management
/ Operational research. Management science
/ Prospect theory
/ Quantitative analysis
/ Regret
/ Regret theory
/ Reliability
/ Reliability theory. Replacement problems
/ Risk aversion
/ Stimuli
/ Studies
/ Theory
/ Transitivity
/ Uncertainty
/ Utility functions
/ utility measurement
/ Utility theory
/ Valence
/ Violations
2010
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A Quantitative Measurement of Regret Theory
by
Cillo, Alessandra
, Bleichrodt, Han
, Diecidue, Enrico
in
Ambivalence
/ Analysis
/ Applied sciences
/ Convexity
/ Decision making
/ Decision theory
/ decision under uncertainty
/ Economic uncertainty
/ Exact sciences and technology
/ Management
/ Management principles
/ Management science
/ Measurement
/ Measurement techniques
/ Measures
/ Operational research and scientific management
/ Operational research. Management science
/ Prospect theory
/ Quantitative analysis
/ Regret
/ Regret theory
/ Reliability
/ Reliability theory. Replacement problems
/ Risk aversion
/ Stimuli
/ Studies
/ Theory
/ Transitivity
/ Uncertainty
/ Utility functions
/ utility measurement
/ Utility theory
/ Valence
/ Violations
2010
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A Quantitative Measurement of Regret Theory
2010
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
This paper introduces a method to measure regret theory, a popular theory of decision under uncertainty. Regret theory allows for violations of transitivity, and it may seem paradoxical to quantitatively measure an intransitive theory. We adopt the trade-off method and show that it is robust to violations of transitivity. Our method makes no assumptions about the shape of the functions reflecting utility and regret. It can be performed at the individual level, taking account of preference heterogeneity. Our data support the main assumption of regret theory, that people are disproportionately averse to large regrets, even when event-splitting effects are controlled for. The findings are robust: similar results were obtained in two measurements using different stimuli. The data support the reliability of the trade-off method: its measurements could be replicated using different stimuli and were not susceptible to strategic responding.
Publisher
INFORMS,Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.