Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
NEGOTIATING OTHERNESS: IDENTITY, POWER, AND SURVIVAL IN J.M. COETZEE’S POST-APARTHEID NARRATIVES
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
NEGOTIATING OTHERNESS: IDENTITY, POWER, AND SURVIVAL IN J.M. COETZEE’S POST-APARTHEID NARRATIVES
Do you wish to request the book?
NEGOTIATING OTHERNESS: IDENTITY, POWER, AND SURVIVAL IN J.M. COETZEE’S POST-APARTHEID NARRATIVES
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
NEGOTIATING OTHERNESS: IDENTITY, POWER, AND SURVIVAL IN J.M. COETZEE’S POST-APARTHEID NARRATIVES
2025
Overview
This article investigates the negotiation of otherness, identity, and survival in J.M. Coetzee’s post-apartheid narratives, with particular focus on Disgrace (1999) and selective references to later works such as Elizabeth Costello (2003) and The Childhood of Jesus (2013). Coetzee’s fiction foregrounds how post-apartheid South Africa remains a space of contested identities, shifting power relations, and fragile freedoms. Through characters such as David Lurie, Melanie Isaacs, Lucy, and Petrus, Disgrace dramatizes the interplay of gendered vulnerability, racial power, and land politics. Lucy’s refusal of legal recourse after her assault and her decision to remain on her farm under Petrus’s protection exemplify “strategic unfreedom,” a form of survival that complicates liberal ideals of autonomy. Lurie’s moral transformation, marked by humility in caring for abandoned animals, highlights Coetzee’s ethical turn toward recognizing otherness in all its forms—human and nonhuman. Drawing on postcolonial theory (Bhabha, Spivak), biopolitics and necropolitics (Foucault, Mbembe), and the ethics of alterity (Levinas), the study demonstrates that survival in Coetzee’s post-apartheid fiction is less about heroic resistance than about fragile negotiations of vulnerability, silence, and dependence. The analysis concludes that Coetzee redefines freedom not as absolute mastery but as ethical survival within conditions of unfreedom, thereby situating his work at the intersection of political critique and moral responsibility.
