Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative Thermodynamic and Preliminary Performance Assessment of N2O, Gaseous O2, and LOX for a 1 kN Hybrid Rocket Engine
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative Thermodynamic and Preliminary Performance Assessment of N2O, Gaseous O2, and LOX for a 1 kN Hybrid Rocket Engine
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative Thermodynamic and Preliminary Performance Assessment of N2O, Gaseous O2, and LOX for a 1 kN Hybrid Rocket Engine
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparative Thermodynamic and Preliminary Performance Assessment of N2O, Gaseous O2, and LOX for a 1 kN Hybrid Rocket Engine
2026
Overview
Hybrid rocket engines offer a compromise between safety, controllability, and performance, making them attractive for small-scale propulsion systems. However, oxidizer selection remains a critical early-stage design decision that cannot be determined solely from ideal thermodynamic metrics. This study presents a comparative analysis of three oxidizers—nitrous oxide (N2O), gaseous oxygen (GOX), and liquid oxygen (LOX)—for a 1 kN-class hybrid rocket engine using HDPE fuel under identical operating conditions. Equilibrium combustion performance was first evaluated using NASA Chemical Equilibrium with Applications (CEA) to determine optimal oxidizer-to-fuel ratios and theoretical specific impulse. These results were subsequently refined using Rocket Propulsion Analysis (RPA) to incorporate finite combustion chamber geometry and non-ideal nozzle expansion effects. The equilibrium analysis predicts maximum specific impulses of approximately 260 s for N2O/HDPE and nearly 300 s for oxygen-based systems. However, finite-geometry modelling indicates that practical performance is reduced by approximately 5–8%, yielding delivered specific impulses of about 275 s for GOX and 272 s for LOX. The results demonstrate that although oxygen (GOX and LOX) provides higher thermodynamic performance, the practical advantage of LOX over GOX becomes marginal at the kilonewton scale. Consequently, oxidizer selection for small hybrid engines should be treated as a system-level trade-off involving performance, infrastructure complexity, and operational safety.
Publisher
MDPI AG
Subject
