Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Theoretical evaluation on CO2 removal potential of enhanced weathering based on shrinking core model
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Theoretical evaluation on CO2 removal potential of enhanced weathering based on shrinking core model
Do you wish to request the book?
Theoretical evaluation on CO2 removal potential of enhanced weathering based on shrinking core model
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Theoretical evaluation on CO2 removal potential of enhanced weathering based on shrinking core model
2023
Overview
The discrepancy between current CO2 emission trend and the targeted 1.5 °C warming requires the implementation of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. Among the engineered CDRs, enhanced weathering (EW) is expected to exhibit substantial potential for CO2 removal, owing to the availability of abundant reserves of ultramafic rocks and demonstration of worldwide liming practice. While the shrinking core model (SCM) has been commonly adopted in previous theoretical and experimental studies, there still lacks a comprehensive assessment on the impacts of model parameters, such as rock particle size, size distribution, weathering rate and time length on the weathering kinetics and the resultant CDR potential. Herein, this study incorporates particle size distribution of rock powder into the surface reaction-controlled SCM, and conducts sensitivity analysis on EW’s CDR potential quantitatively. Even fully powered by low-carbon energy in the optimistic case, the application of EW with olivine only achieves maximum CDR per unit of rock and energy consumption of 0.01 kg CO2 per kg rock and 19 g per kWh at size of 8 and 22 μm respectively, indicating the limitations of EW. The derived optimal application parameters with olivine powers within 3.7–79 μm provide valuable insights into the practical real-world applications to achieve net CO2 removal.
