Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Structured reporting of neuroendocrine tumors in PET/CT using 18FSiTATE - impact on interdisciplinary communication
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Structured reporting of neuroendocrine tumors in PET/CT using 18FSiTATE - impact on interdisciplinary communication
Do you wish to request the book?
Structured reporting of neuroendocrine tumors in PET/CT using 18FSiTATE - impact on interdisciplinary communication
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Structured reporting of neuroendocrine tumors in PET/CT using 18FSiTATE - impact on interdisciplinary communication
2025
Overview
Our retrospective single-center study aims to evaluate the impact of structured reporting (SR) using a self-developed template on report quality compared to free-text reporting (FTR) in [
18
F]SiTATE Positron Emission Tomography/Computer Tomography (PET/CT) for the primary staging and therapy monitoring of patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumors (NET). In total 50 patients were included. FTRs and SRs were generated post-examination. All reports were evaluated by a radiologist and a surgeon through a questionnaire to determine their contribution to facilitating clinical decision-making and to assess their completeness, linguistic quality, and overall quality. SR significantly increased the capacity of facilitating therapy decision-making from 32% in FTR to 55% in SR (
p
< 0.001). Trust in the report was significantly higher in SR with a mean of 5.0 (SD = 0.5) vs. 4.7 (SD = 0.5) for FTR (
p
< 0.001). SR received significantly higher mean ratings regarding linguistic quality with 4.7 for SR vs. 4.4 for FTR (
p
= 0.004) and overall report quality with a mean of 4.9 for SR vs. 4.6 for FTR (
p
< 0.001). Concluding that SR enhances the overall quality of reports in [
18
F]SiTATE-PET/CTs for NET staging, serving as a tool to streamline clinical decision-making and enhance interdisciplinary communication in the future.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group,Nature Portfolio
Subject
/ 692/4028
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Female
/ Humanities and Social Sciences
/ Humans
/ Interdisciplinary Communication
/ Male
/ Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging
/ Neuroendocrine Tumors - pathology
/ PET/CT
/ Positron emission tomography
/ Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods
/ Science
