Journal Article

Advance care planning with patients on hemodialysis: an implementation study

Garvey, Casey, Cohen, Lewis M., Goff, Sarah L., Eneanya, Nwamaka D., Unruh, Mark L., Germain, Michael J., Klingensmith, Jamie

2019

Overview

Background Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on hemodialysis have limited life expectancy, yet their palliative care needs often go unmet. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators for implementation of “Shared Decision Making and Renal Supportive Care” (SDM-RSC), an intervention to improve advance care planning (ACP) for patients with ESKD on hemodialysis. Methods The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was the organizing framework for this study. CFIR is a theory-based implementation framework consisting of five domains (Intervention Characteristics, Inner Setting, Outer Setting, Characteristics of Individuals, and Process), each of which has associated constructs. Potential barriers and facilitators to implementation of the SDM-RSC intervention were identified through observation of study procedures, surveys of social workers nephrologists, study participants, and family members, and assessment of intervention fidelity. Results Twenty-nine nephrologists and 24 social workers, representing 18 outpatient dialysis units in Massachusetts ( n  = 10) and New Mexico ( n  = 8), were trained to conduct SDM-RSC intervention sessions. A total of 102 of 125 patient enrolled in the study received the intervention; 40 had family members present. Potential barriers and facilitators to implementation of the SDM-RSC intervention were identified in each of the five CFIR domains. Barriers included complexity of the intervention; challenges to meeting with patients on non-dialysis days; difficulties scheduling intervention sessions due to nephrologists’ and social workers’ caseloads; perceived need for local policy change regarding ACP; perceived need for additional ACP training for social workers and nephrologists; and lack of endorsement of the intervention by some staff members. Facilitators included: training for social workers, national dialysis chain leadership engagement and the institution of social worker/nephrologist clinic champions. Conclusions ACP for patients on hemodialysis can have a positive impact on end-of-life outcomes for patients and their families but does not take place routinely. The barriers to effective implementation of interventions to improve ACP identified in this study might be addressed by: adapting the intervention for local contexts with input from clinicians, dialysis staff, patients and families; providing nephrologists and social workers additional training prior to delivering the intervention; and developing policy that routinizes ACP for hemodialysis patients. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02405312 . Registered 04/01/2015.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,BMC
• Subject: Adult / Advance Care Planning / Aged / Beliefs, opinions and attitudes / Chronic kidney failure / Decision making / Decision Making, Shared / End-of-life / Family / Female / Health aspects / Hemodialysis / Hemodialysis patients / Humans / Implementation / Intervention / Kidney diseases / Kidney Failure, Chronic - psychology / Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy / Life expectancy / Male / Medical research / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Methods / Middle Aged / Nephrologists - psychology / Nephrologists - statistics & numerical data / Pain Medicine / Palliative care / Palliative Care - methods / Palliative Care - psychology / Palliative care in other conditions / Palliative Medicine / Planning / Quality of Life Research / Renal Dialysis - methods / Renal Dialysis - psychology / Research Article / Shared decision-making / Social workers / Social Workers - psychology / Social Workers - statistics & numerical data / Surveys and Questionnaires / Workers