MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison between enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intracellular cytokine flow cytometry assay of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell response in healthy participants
Comparison between enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intracellular cytokine flow cytometry assay of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell response in healthy participants
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison between enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intracellular cytokine flow cytometry assay of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell response in healthy participants
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison between enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intracellular cytokine flow cytometry assay of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell response in healthy participants
Comparison between enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intracellular cytokine flow cytometry assay of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell response in healthy participants

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison between enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intracellular cytokine flow cytometry assay of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell response in healthy participants
Comparison between enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intracellular cytokine flow cytometry assay of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell response in healthy participants
Journal Article

Comparison between enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intracellular cytokine flow cytometry assay of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell response in healthy participants

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) usually establishes a lifelong latent infection after primary infection. Reactivation occurs sporadically and is controlled by cell-mediated immune response (CMIR). Monitoring of CMIR against CMV is mandatory in immunocompromised patients to adjust immunosuppressive drugs to prevent serious end-organ damage after CMV reactivation. Intracellular staining (ICS) and enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) quantifying CMV-specific T-cells are generally used as surrogate markers for CMIR against CMV. Whether the results of these 2 methods correlate well is not known. This study compared the numbers of CMV-specific T-cells identified by ELISPOT and ICS in healthy adult volunteers. Correlation with CMV serological status was explored. Thirty peripheral blood samples from healthy individuals were quantified for IFN-γ-producing cells after stimulation with whole CMV and IE1 using ICS, and IFN-γ-secreting cells after stimulation with whole CMV lysate and IE1 peptide pool using ICS and IFN-γ-secreting cells by ELISPOT. Anti-CMV IgG levels were analyzed concomitantly using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. There were 30 healthy participants, 15 (50%) male, with a mean age of 37.8 (± 7.6) years. Twenty-eight (93.3%) were seropositive against CMV. The CMV-specific CD3+ cells, as measured by ICS, were highly correlated with the spot numbers obtained by the ELISPOT, irrespective of CMV antigens used (whole CMV, r = 0.7677, p < 0.0001; IE1, r = 0.6516, p < 0.0001). The numbers of CMV-specific CD3+ cells quantified by IE1 stimulation by these 2 assays were statistically correlated with anti-CMV IgG levels (ICS, r = 0.5070, p = 0.004; ELISPOT, r = 0.4384, p = 0.015). Among the 30 participants, CMV-specific T cells were detected in all participants (100%), including the two seronegative individuals. The present study demonstrated that CMV-specific T-cells measured by ICS and ELISPOT assays were well correlated, suggesting that these assays could be used to monitor CMV-specific T-cells. CMV IgG levels may reflect prior CMV infection and CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMIR) in immunocompetent individuals.