Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Do Goal Orientations and Coaching Efficacy Contribute to the Likelihood of Coaches' Transformational Leadership?
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Do Goal Orientations and Coaching Efficacy Contribute to the Likelihood of Coaches' Transformational Leadership?
Do you wish to request the book?
Do Goal Orientations and Coaching Efficacy Contribute to the Likelihood of Coaches' Transformational Leadership?
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Do Goal Orientations and Coaching Efficacy Contribute to the Likelihood of Coaches' Transformational Leadership?
2020
Overview
In an effort to improve youth sport experiences, many studies have investigated the influence of various coaching styles. A growing body of sport research links transformational leadership (TL) to positive outcomes (Stenling & Tafvelin, 2014; Vella, Oades & Crowe, 2013). Yet, little effort has been made to examine factors that influence sports coaches 'proclivities to adopt TL behaviors. According to Horn's (2008) model of coaching effectiveness, coaches 'beliefs, values, and goals are antecedents to coaching behaviors. In this study, TL was situated as a coaching behavior informed by two salient antecedent factors: motivational goal orientations (GO) and coaching efficacy (CE). Youth basketball coaches (males = 102, females = 20) completed an online survey measuring TL, GO, and CE. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to examine the relationships between coaches ' GO, CE, and TL. Results yielded an acceptable fit of the proposed model. CE was strongly associated with the presence of TL behaviors, but coaches' GO were not related to TL behaviors. Findings suggest that the more coaches believe in their ability to affect the learning and performance of their athletes the more TL behaviors they will engage in. Thus, coaches should formulate strategies to assist in developing CE.
Publisher
University of South Alabama,Journal of Sport Behavior
Subject
