Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
by
Uhlig, Johannes
, Trojan, Lutz
, Strauss, Arne
, Ali Seif Amir Hosseini
, Uhlig, Annemarie
, Lotz, Joachim
, Kim, Hyun S
, Rücker, Gerta
in
Cancer
/ Complications
/ Kidney cancer
/ Medical personnel
/ Meta-analysis
/ Mortality
/ Nephrectomy
/ Patients
/ Physicians
/ Preservation
/ Radio frequency
/ Renal function
/ Survival
/ Systematic review
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
by
Uhlig, Johannes
, Trojan, Lutz
, Strauss, Arne
, Ali Seif Amir Hosseini
, Uhlig, Annemarie
, Lotz, Joachim
, Kim, Hyun S
, Rücker, Gerta
in
Cancer
/ Complications
/ Kidney cancer
/ Medical personnel
/ Meta-analysis
/ Mortality
/ Nephrectomy
/ Patients
/ Physicians
/ Preservation
/ Radio frequency
/ Renal function
/ Survival
/ Systematic review
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
by
Uhlig, Johannes
, Trojan, Lutz
, Strauss, Arne
, Ali Seif Amir Hosseini
, Uhlig, Annemarie
, Lotz, Joachim
, Kim, Hyun S
, Rücker, Gerta
in
Cancer
/ Complications
/ Kidney cancer
/ Medical personnel
/ Meta-analysis
/ Mortality
/ Nephrectomy
/ Patients
/ Physicians
/ Preservation
/ Radio frequency
/ Renal function
/ Survival
/ Systematic review
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Journal Article
Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
PurposeTo compare partial nephrectomy (PN), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CRA) and microwave ablation (MWA) regarding oncologic, perioperative and functional outcomes.Material and methodsThe MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE libraries were searched for studies comparing PN, RFA, CRA or MWA and reporting on any-cause or cancer-specific mortality, local recurrence, complications or renal function. Network meta-analyses were performed.ResultsForty-seven studies with 24,077 patients were included. Patients receiving RFA, CRA or MWA were older and had more comorbidities compared with PN. All-cause mortality was higher for CRA and RFA compared with PN (incidence rate ratio IRR = 2.58, IRR = 2.58, p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences in cancer-specific mortality were evident. Local recurrence was higher for CRA, RFA and MWA compared with PN (IRR = 4.13, IRR = 1.79, IRR = 2.52, p < 0.05 respectively). A decline in renal function was less pronounced after RFA versus PN, CRA and MWA (mean difference in GFR MD = 6.49; MD = 5.82; MD = 10.89, p < 0.05 respectively).ConclusionHigher overall survival and local control of PN compared with ablative therapies did not translate into significantly better cancer-specific mortality. Most studies carried a high risk of bias by selecting younger and healthier patients for PN, which may drive superior survival and local control. Physicians should be aware of the lack of high-quality evidence and the potential benefits of ablative techniques for certain patients, including a superior complication profile and renal function preservation.Key Points• Patients selected for ablation of small renal masses are older and have more comorbidities compared with those undergoing partial nephrectomy.• Partial nephrectomy yields lower all-cause mortality, which is probably biased by patient selection and does not translate into prolonged cancer-free survival.• The decline of renal function is smallest after radiofrequency ablation for small renal masses.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.