MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Three-dimensional CT-guided Bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor : A comparison of two image registration methods
Three-dimensional CT-guided Bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor : A comparison of two image registration methods
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Three-dimensional CT-guided Bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor : A comparison of two image registration methods
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Three-dimensional CT-guided Bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor : A comparison of two image registration methods
Three-dimensional CT-guided Bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor : A comparison of two image registration methods

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Three-dimensional CT-guided Bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor : A comparison of two image registration methods
Three-dimensional CT-guided Bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor : A comparison of two image registration methods
Journal Article

Three-dimensional CT-guided Bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor : A comparison of two image registration methods

2000
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
To compare two different image registration methods for accurately displaying the position of a flexible bronchoscope on a previously acquired three-dimensional CT scan during bronchoscopy. Bronchoscopy suite of a university hospital. Fifteen adult patients scheduled for nonemergent bronchoscopy. A miniature electromagnetic position sensor was placed at the tip of a flexible bronchoscope. Previously acquired three-dimensional CT scans were registered with the patient in the bronchoscopy suite. Registration method 1 used multiple skin fiducial markers. Registration method 2 used the inner surface of the trachea itself for registration. Method 1 was objectively assessed by measuring the error distance between the real skin marker position and the computer display position. Methods 1 and 2 were subjectively assessed by the bronchoscopist correlating visual bronchoscopic anatomic location with the computer display position on the CT image. The error distance (+/- SD) from known points for registration method 1 was 5.6 +/- 2.7 mm. Objective error distances were not measured for method 2 because no accurate placement of the bronchoscope sensor could be correlated with CT position. Subjectively, method 2 was judged more accurate than method 1 when compared with the fiberoptic view of the airways through the bronchoscope. Additionally, method 2 had the advantage of not requiring placement of fiducial markers before the CT scan. Respiratory motion contributed an error of 3.6 +/- 2.6 mm, which was partially compensated for by a second tracking sensor placed on the patient's chest. Image registration method 2 of surface fitting the trachea rather than method 1 of fiducial markers was subjectively judged to be superior for registering the position of a flexible bronchoscope during bronchoscopy. Method 2 was also more practical inasmuch as no special CT scanning technique was required before bronchoscopy.