Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison between MRI and pathology in the assessment of tumour regression grade in rectal cancer
by
Wotherspoon, Andrew
, Oates, Jacqui
, Begum, Ruwaida
, Glimelius, Bengt
, Chau, Ian
, Tabernero, Josep
, Peckitt, Clare
, Roselló, Susana
, Mendes, Larissa Sena Teixeira
, Thomas, Janet
, Sclafani, Francesco
, Brown, Gina
, Tait, Diana
, Cunningham, David
, Evans, Jessica
, Balyasnikova, Svetlana
in
631/67/1504/1885/1777
/ 631/67/2321
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Biomedicine
/ Cancer
/ Cancer Research
/ Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
/ Clinical Study
/ Clinical trials
/ Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Cytodiagnosis - methods
/ Disease-Free Survival
/ Drug Resistance
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Kaplan-Meier Estimate
/ Magnetic resonance imaging
/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
/ magnetic resonance tumour regression grade
/ Male
/ Middle Aged
/ Molecular Medicine
/ Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ Neoplasm Staging - methods
/ Oncology
/ pathological tumour regression grade
/ rectal cancer
/ Rectal Neoplasms - mortality
/ Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
/ Rectal Neoplasms - therapy
/ Rectum
/ Surgery
/ Survival
/ Tumors
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison between MRI and pathology in the assessment of tumour regression grade in rectal cancer
by
Wotherspoon, Andrew
, Oates, Jacqui
, Begum, Ruwaida
, Glimelius, Bengt
, Chau, Ian
, Tabernero, Josep
, Peckitt, Clare
, Roselló, Susana
, Mendes, Larissa Sena Teixeira
, Thomas, Janet
, Sclafani, Francesco
, Brown, Gina
, Tait, Diana
, Cunningham, David
, Evans, Jessica
, Balyasnikova, Svetlana
in
631/67/1504/1885/1777
/ 631/67/2321
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Biomedicine
/ Cancer
/ Cancer Research
/ Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
/ Clinical Study
/ Clinical trials
/ Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Cytodiagnosis - methods
/ Disease-Free Survival
/ Drug Resistance
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Kaplan-Meier Estimate
/ Magnetic resonance imaging
/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
/ magnetic resonance tumour regression grade
/ Male
/ Middle Aged
/ Molecular Medicine
/ Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ Neoplasm Staging - methods
/ Oncology
/ pathological tumour regression grade
/ rectal cancer
/ Rectal Neoplasms - mortality
/ Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
/ Rectal Neoplasms - therapy
/ Rectum
/ Surgery
/ Survival
/ Tumors
2017
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison between MRI and pathology in the assessment of tumour regression grade in rectal cancer
by
Wotherspoon, Andrew
, Oates, Jacqui
, Begum, Ruwaida
, Glimelius, Bengt
, Chau, Ian
, Tabernero, Josep
, Peckitt, Clare
, Roselló, Susana
, Mendes, Larissa Sena Teixeira
, Thomas, Janet
, Sclafani, Francesco
, Brown, Gina
, Tait, Diana
, Cunningham, David
, Evans, Jessica
, Balyasnikova, Svetlana
in
631/67/1504/1885/1777
/ 631/67/2321
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Biomedicine
/ Cancer
/ Cancer Research
/ Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
/ Clinical Study
/ Clinical trials
/ Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Cytodiagnosis - methods
/ Disease-Free Survival
/ Drug Resistance
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Kaplan-Meier Estimate
/ Magnetic resonance imaging
/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
/ magnetic resonance tumour regression grade
/ Male
/ Middle Aged
/ Molecular Medicine
/ Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ Neoplasm Staging - methods
/ Oncology
/ pathological tumour regression grade
/ rectal cancer
/ Rectal Neoplasms - mortality
/ Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
/ Rectal Neoplasms - therapy
/ Rectum
/ Surgery
/ Survival
/ Tumors
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison between MRI and pathology in the assessment of tumour regression grade in rectal cancer
Journal Article
Comparison between MRI and pathology in the assessment of tumour regression grade in rectal cancer
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background:
Limited data exist regarding the correlation between MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG) and pathological TRG (pTRG) in rectal cancer.
Methods:
mrTRG and pTRG were compared in rectal cancer patients from two phase II trials (EXPERT and EXPERT-C). The agreement between radiologist and pathologist was assessed with the weighted
κ
test while the Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival outcomes.
Results:
One hundred ninety-one patients were included. Median time from completion of neoadjuvant treatment to pre-operative MRI and surgery was 4.1 weeks (interquartile range (IQR): 3.7–4.7) and 6.6 weeks (IQR: 5.9–7.6), respectively. Fair agreement was found between mrTRG and pTRG when regression was classified according to standard five-tier systems (
κ
=0.24) or modified three-tier systems (
κ
=0.25). Sensitivity and specificity of mrTRG 1–2 (complete/good radiological regression) for the prediction of pathological complete response was 74.4% (95% CI: 58.8–86.5) and 62.8% (95% CI: 54.5–70.6), respectively. Survival outcomes of patients with intermediate pathological regression (pTRG 2) were numerically better if complete/good regression was also observed on imaging (mrTRG 1–2) compared to poor regression (mrTRG 3–5) (5-year recurrence-free survival 76.9%
vs
65.9%,
P
=0.18; 5-year overall survival 80.6%
vs
68.8%,
P
=0.22).
Conclusions:
The agreement between mrTRG and pTRG is low and mrTRG cannot be used as a surrogate of pTRG. Further studies are warranted to assess the ability of mrTRG to identify pathological complete responders for the adoption of non-operative management strategies and to provide complementary prognostic information to pTRG for better risk-stratification after surgery.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group
Subject
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Cancer
/ Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
/ magnetic resonance tumour regression grade
/ Male
/ Oncology
/ pathological tumour regression grade
/ Rectal Neoplasms - mortality
/ Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
/ Rectum
/ Surgery
/ Survival
/ Tumors
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.