MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
8000015 Incorporating bias appraisal into evidence synthesis: examples from recent IARC Monographs evaluations
8000015 Incorporating bias appraisal into evidence synthesis: examples from recent IARC Monographs evaluations
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
8000015 Incorporating bias appraisal into evidence synthesis: examples from recent IARC Monographs evaluations
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
8000015 Incorporating bias appraisal into evidence synthesis: examples from recent IARC Monographs evaluations
8000015 Incorporating bias appraisal into evidence synthesis: examples from recent IARC Monographs evaluations

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
8000015 Incorporating bias appraisal into evidence synthesis: examples from recent IARC Monographs evaluations
8000015 Incorporating bias appraisal into evidence synthesis: examples from recent IARC Monographs evaluations
Journal Article

8000015 Incorporating bias appraisal into evidence synthesis: examples from recent IARC Monographs evaluations

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ObjectiveSummarize the framework for incorporating bias appraisal for observational epidemiology studies into evidence synthesis for cancer hazard identification, as recommended in the recently published IARC volume. Describe how bias assessment has been incorporated into recent Monographs evaluations.MethodsThe recommended framework for incorporating bias assessments into evidence synthesis focuses on identification of key biases among informative studies, including direction and (where possible) magnitude, assessing their impact on study estimates, and triangulating findings among studies with different sources of bias. Scenarios are described for situations with few vs. many informative studies. We examined use of the bias assessment approaches laid out in the book for confounding, information bias, and selection bias in Monographs Volumes 131–138 (evaluations conducted in 2022–2025).ResultsEach of the eight volumes considered has incorporated bias assessment tools into the evidence synthesis. For example, in an evaluation of antimony (Vol. 131), an assessment of bias resulting from co-exposure to arsenic among smelter workers led to a conclusion that arsenic could not entirely explain the observed lung cancer risk. In evaluations of occupational exposure as a firefighter (Vol. 132) and several pharmaceuticals (Vol. 137), meta-analyses stratified by major sources of bias were used in evidence triangulation. In the evaluation of PFOA (Vol. 135), information bias from single-timepoint exposure measurement was quantified using repeated-measurement data. For acrylonitrile (Vol. 136), externally conducted bias adjustment for healthy worker survivor bias was important for the determination of sufficient evidence for lung cancer.ConclusionsIncorporation of bias appraisal tools into evidence synthesis has strengthened recent IARC Monographs cancer hazard identification, giving tools to inform and complement Working Groups’ expert judgment.

MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks