Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Reconsidering the Responsivity Principle: A Way to Move Forward
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Reconsidering the Responsivity Principle: A Way to Move Forward
Do you wish to request the book?
Reconsidering the Responsivity Principle: A Way to Move Forward
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Trade Publication Article
Reconsidering the Responsivity Principle: A Way to Move Forward
2014
Overview
The fourth principle was the override principle, which called for professional discretion in cases where behavior could not be explained with existing knowledge. Since 1990 the RNR model has expanded to include many more principles (Andrews & Bonta, 2010a; 2010b), but the principles of risk, need, and responsivity remain at the core. More recent tests of the risk principle with actuarial measures of offender risk at the individual level have been supportive of the risk principle for adult offenders (Bourgon & Armstrong, 2005; Lowenkamp & Latessa, 2005; Sperber, Latessa, 8c Makarios, 2013), female offenders (Lovins, Lowenkamp, Latessa, 8c Smith, 2007), violent offenders (Polaschek, 2011) and sex offenders (Lovins, Lowenkamp, 8c Latessa, 2009; Mailloux, Abracen, Serin, Cousineau, Malcolm, 8c Looman, 2003).
Publisher
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
Subject
