Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
State Labs of Federalism and Law Enforcement \Drone\ Use
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
State Labs of Federalism and Law Enforcement \Drone\ Use
Do you wish to request the book?
State Labs of Federalism and Law Enforcement \Drone\ Use
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
State Labs of Federalism and Law Enforcement \Drone\ Use
2015
Overview
Current societal anxiety towards unmanned aerial systems (UAS) may well be rooted in emotion, misconceptions, and biases about their use. Attempting to assuage such concerns with legislation is unlikely to be successful or effective, almost regardless of how one defines those terms or from what perspective they are considered. This Article assumes that UAS will become prevalent and, in the process, will have fewer stigmas attached. As societal views change, so too will state legislation. Accordingly, the current state legislation regulating law enforcement UAS use is but the first round of experiments. But it is important to take stock of what state legislation would currently allow law enforcement to do with UAS. This Article examines these state labs of federalism to identify at what point, and which state UAS experiments, the Supreme Court may rule constitute a search in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Publisher
Washington & Lee University, School of Law
Subject
