Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Topichood and quantification in L1 Dutch1
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Topichood and quantification in L1 Dutch1
Do you wish to request the book?
Topichood and quantification in L1 Dutch1
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Topichood and quantification in L1 Dutch1
2004
Overview
(6) a. Every boy is riding a horse. b. [Every [boy] is riding a horse] c. [[Every boy] is riding a horse] The advantage of this proposal is that both subject and object NP are in the scope of the quantifier. [...]the quantificational nature of these quantifiers demand exhaustion of both entities denoted by the subject as well as by the object. [...]in our view, all symmetrical responses by children are errors due to flaws in experimental design\" (Grain et. al.; 1996:109). According to the Weak Quantifier Hypothesis first proposed in Drozd and Van Loosbroek (1999), the explanation of spreading behavior should be found in difficulties in the formation of presuppositions. [...]Freeman, Sinha and Stedmon (1982) claim that children build up presuppositions on the basis of the presented picture.
