Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose The aim of this project was to review the literature and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of cytokines and growth factor agents for the prevention or treatment of oral mucositis induced by cancer chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Methods A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: Recommendation, Suggestion, No guideline possible. Results Sixty-four clinical studies across 11 interventions were evaluated. A recommendation was made for the use of recombinant human KGF-1 (palifermin) at a dose of 60 μg/kg per day for 3 days prior to conditioning treatment and for 3 days post-transplant for prevention of oral mucositis in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and total body irradiation followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies. A suggestion was made against using granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor mouthwash for the prevention of oral mucositis in the setting of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. No guideline was possible for any other cytokine or growth factor agents due to inconclusive evidence. Conclusions Of the cytokine and growth factor agents studied for oral mucositis, the evidence only supports use of palifermin in the specific population listed above. Additional well-designed research is needed on other cytokine and growth factor interventions and in other cancer treatment settings.

Currently, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) remains the standard mobilizing agent for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) donors, allowing the safe collection of adequate PBSCs from the vast majority of donors. However, G-CSF mobilization can be associated with some significant side effects and requires a multi-day dosing regimen. The other cytokine approved for stem cell mobilization, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), alters graft composition and may reduce the development of graft-versus-host disease, but a significant minority of donors fails to provide sufficient CD34+ cells with GM-CSF and some experience unacceptable toxicity. AMD3100 is a promising new mobilizing agent, which may have several advantages over G-CSF for donor mobilization. As it is a direct antagonist of the interaction between the chemokine stromal-derived factor-1 and its receptor CXCR4, AMD3100 mobilizes PBSCs within hours rather than days. It is also well tolerated, with no significant side effects reported in any of the clinical trials to date. Studies of autologous and allogeneic transplantation of AMD3100 mobilized grafts have demonstrated prompt and stable engraftment. Here, we review the current state of stem cell mobilization in normal donors and discuss novel strategies for donor stem cell mobilization.

In patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, the use of inhaled recombinant granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor resulted in a significantly better alveolar–arterial oxygen gradient at 25 weeks than the use of placebo. The beneficial effect was not observed in smokers.

The innate immune system represents the initial arm of host defense against pathogenic bacteria, fungi, and parasites. Neutrophils, monocytes, and tissue-based macrophages are major cellular components of this system. The potential ability to augment activity of the innate immune system has increased dramatically during the past 2 decades, with the discovery and development of cytokines. Four cytokines, namely granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), and interferon (IFN)-γ, have received increasing attention as potential adjunctive agents for the treatment of infectious diseases. In various animal models of infection, therapeutic administration of each of the 4 cytokines has been shown to enhance pathogen eradication and to decrease morbidity and/or mortality. However, variable therapeutic efficacy has been reported in clinical trials conducted to date. This review summarizes the current status of the use of G-CSF, GM-CSF, M-CSF, and IFN-γ in the treatment of infectious diseases.

Background 8MW0511 is a novel, long-acting recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) produced by the fusion of the N-terminus of highly active modified G-CSF with the C-terminus of human serum albumin (HSA). Current G-CSF treatments require frequent administration and have limitations in efficacy and convenience, highlighting the need for a longer-acting alternative with fewer injections and improved outcomes. Here, we report a phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of 8MW0511 with those of the approved PEG-rhG-CSF. Methods Patients with breast cancer were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to receive either 8MW0511 or PEG-rhG-CSF after four cycles of standard chemotherapy with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide, with or without doxorubicin. The primary efficacy endpoint was to evaluate the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) between 8MW0511 and PEG-rhG-CSF during the first cycle. Results Eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either 8MW0511 (n = 328) or PEG-rhG-CSF (n = 164). During the first cycle, the average DSN was 0.24 days for the 8MW0511 group and 0.25 days for the PEG-rhG-CSF group. The mean difference in DSN [-0.02 days (95% Confidence interval: -0.12, 0.08)] met the primary study endpoint. During cycles 2–4, the DSN results were consistent with those of cycle 1. The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia was lower in the 8MW0511 group than in the PEG-rhG-CSF group across all chemotherapy cycles. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) across all cycles showed no significant difference between the two groups. Other efficacy endpoints and adverse events were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions The study findings confirm that 8MW0511 is not inferior to PEG-rhG-CSF in terms of efficacy and shows comparable safety profiles. Additionally, 8MW0511 has the potential to significantly decrease the duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, along with a reduction in the occurrence of FN and severe neutropenia.

To study the efficacy and safety of Polyethylene glycolated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in the prevention of neutropenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study conducted from June 1, 2021, to October 31, 2022 on patients diagnosed with locally advanced NPC. Participants were divided into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received PEG-rhG-CSF injections post-chemotherapy cycles, whereas the control group received standard care without additional intervention. Outcomes assessed included grade 3/4 neutropenia incidence, blood cell count changes, febrile neutropenia rates, delays or interruptions in chemotherapy/radiotherapy due to hematological toxicity, oral mucositis incidents, and bone pain occurrences, comparing these between both groups. 1. 88 patients with locally advanced NPC were included, the incidence of grade 3 neutropenia in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P = 0.026); 2. The white blood cell count and neutrophil count in D7, D10, D14, and D21 in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.01); 3. The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. The incidence of bone pain in the experimental group was 34.1%, of which most were mild bone pain, and no severe bone pain occurred. The leukocyte and neutrophil counts of the patients in the bone pain group were significantly higher than those of the patients in the no bone pain group, P(WBC) = 0.001, P(ANC) = 0.002. The preventive use of PEG-rhG-CSF decreases the incidence of neutropenia in patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy for NPC, thereby reducing rates of chemotherapy delays and radiotherapy interruptions, with mild adverse reactions that are tolerable by patients.

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely acknowledged for its efficacy in managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN), albeit accompanied by a spectrum of potential adverse effects. This study conducted a comprehensive analysis utilizing real-world data sourced from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, spanning the years 2004 to 2023, to assess and compare adverse events (AEs) associated with recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF) and its polyethylene glycol-modified form (PEG-rhG-CSF). A comprehensive analysis was conducted using FAERS data to evaluate the reporting proportion of AEs, gender-based disparities, and specific AEs such as bone pain. Statistical analyses included Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) calculations and comparisons of median time to AE onset between PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF. The study revealed that PEG-rhG-CSF was associated with a significantly higher number of adverse events (AEs) compared to rhG-CSF (76,155 vs. 10,953 cases). Female patients experienced a higher reporting proportion of AEs than males for both treatments, with PEG-rhG-CSF showing 54.2% of cases in females and rhG-CSF showing 46.1%, compared to 27.1% and 34.7% in males, respectively. Bone pain emerged as the most common AE, with PEG-rhG-CSF linked to 2,473 cases and rhG-CSF to 581 cases, and a higher reporting odds ratio (ROR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07–1.29) for PEG-rhG-CSF. Additionally, the median time to onset of AEs was shorter for PEG-rhG-CSF (3 days, IQR: 1–9) than for rhG-CSF (9 days, IQR: 2–42). Delayed AEs, such as splenomegaly, capillary leak syndrome, interstitial lung disease, and lung infiltration, were also identified, emphasizing the importance of close patient follow-up. The study highlights significant differences in AE reporting proportion, gender disparities, and onset timing between PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF. These findings emphasize the need for close patient monitoring, especially for delayed AEs that may manifest after discharge. Further assessment of real-world data is warranted.

Patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis received inhaled molgramostim or matching placebo for 24 weeks. Patients receiving molgramostim had greater improvement in pulmonary gas transfer and alleviation of symptoms than those receiving placebo.

In this single-arm, non-randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03363373), 74 patients with relapsed/refractory high-risk neuroblastoma and residual disease in bone/bone marrow (BM) received naxitamab on Days 1, 3, and 5 (3 mg/kg/day) with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Days -4 to 5) every 4 weeks, until complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) followed by 5 additional cycles every 4 weeks. Primary endpoint in the prespecified interim analysis was overall response (2017 International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria). Among 26 responders (CR + PR) in the efficacy population ( N  = 52), 58% had refractory disease, and 42% had relapsed disease. Overall response rate (ORR) was 50% (95% CI: 36-64%), and CR and PR were observed in 38% and 12%, respectively. With the 95% CI lower limit for ORR exceeding 20%, the primary endpoint of overall response was met. Patients with evaluable bone disease had a 58% (29/50) bone compartment response (CR, 40%; PR, 18%). BM compartment response was 74% (17/23; CR, 74%). One-year overall survival and progression-free survival (secondary endpoints) were 93% (95% CI: 80-98%) and 35% (95% CI: 16-54%), respectively. Naxitamab-related Grade 3 adverse events included hypotension (58%) and pain (54%). Overall, naxitamab demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy with manageable safety in patients with residual neuroblastoma in bone/BM. Neuroblastoma is an aggressive childhood cancer with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Here the authors report the results of a phase 2 trial of the anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody naxitamab plus GM-CSF for relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma.

A woman receives a diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; a standard chemotherapy regimen is recommended. Use of prophylactic granulocyte CSF is considered. G-CSF stimulates proliferation of neutrophil progenitors and release of mature neutrophils from bone marrow. Foreword This Journal feature begins with a case vignette that includes a therapeutic recommendation. A discussion of the clinical problem and the mechanism of benefit of this form of therapy follows. Major clinical studies, the clinical use of this therapy, and potential adverse effects are reviewed. Relevant formal guidelines, if they exist, are presented. The article ends with the authors' clinical recommendations. Stage A 55-year-old, previously healthy woman received a diagnosis of diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma after the evaluation of an enlarged left axillary lymph node obtained on biopsy. She had been asymptomatic except for the presence of enlarged axillary lymph nodes, which she had found while bathing. She was referred to an oncologist, who performed a staging evaluation. A complete blood count and test results for liver and renal function and serum lactate dehydrogenase were normal. Positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (PET–CT) identified enlarged lymph nodes with abnormal uptake in the left axilla, mediastinum, and retroperitoneum. Results on bone marrow biopsy were . . .