Explore the vast range of titles available.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a global crisis, challenging healthcare systems worldwide. Many patients present with a remarkable disconnect in rest between profound hypoxemia yet without proportional signs of respiratory distress (i.e. happy hypoxemia) and rapid deterioration can occur. This particular clinical presentation in COVID-19 patients contrasts with the experience of physicians usually treating critically ill patients in respiratory failure and ensuring timely referral to the intensive care unit can, therefore, be challenging. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiological determinants of respiratory drive and hypoxemia may promote a more complete comprehension of a patient’s clinical presentation and management. Preserved oxygen saturation despite low partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood samples occur, due to leftward shift of the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve induced by hypoxemia-driven hyperventilation as well as possible direct viral interactions with hemoglobin. Ventilation-perfusion mismatch, ranging from shunts to alveolar dead space ventilation, is the central hallmark and offers various therapeutic targets.

Even though supplemental oxygen is used for the treatment of patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, the most effective oxygenation targets are not known. In this randomized trial, a lower oxygenation target did not result in lower mortality than a higher target.

Background COVID-19 is a viral respiratory disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-Coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Patients with this disease may be more prone to venous or arterial thrombosis because of the activation of many factors involved in it, including inflammation, platelet activation and endothelial dysfunction. Interferon gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha (MIP1α) are cytokines related to thrombosis. Therefore, this study focused on these three indicators in COVID-19, with the hope to find biomarkers that are associated with patients’ outcome. Methods This is a retrospective single-center study involving 74 severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients recruited from the ICU department of the Tongji Hospital in Wuhan, China. The patients were divided into two groups: severe patients and critically ill patients. The serum IP-10, MCP-1 and MIP1α level in both groups was detected using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. The clinical symptoms, laboratory test results, and the outcome of COVID-19 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results The serum IP-10 and MCP-1 level in critically ill patients was significantly higher than that in severe patients ( P  < 0.001). However, no statistical difference in MIP1α between the two groups was found. The analysis of dynamic changes showed that these indicators remarkably increased in patients with poor prognosis. Since the selected patients were severe or critically ill, no significant difference was observed between survival and death. Conclusions IP-10 and MCP-1 are biomarkers associated with the severity of COVID-19 disease and can be related to the risk of death in COVID-19 patients.

Patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were assigned to standard oxygen therapy, high-flow oxygen therapy, or noninvasive ventilation. The intubation rate did not differ significantly among the groups, but 90-day mortality was lower in the high-flow–oxygen group. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (hereafter, noninvasive ventilation) reduces the need for endotracheal intubation and mortality among patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1 – 3 or severe cardiogenic pulmonary edema. 4 The physiological effects of noninvasive ventilation include a decrease in the work of breathing and improvement in gas exchange. In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, the need for mechanical ventilation is associated with high mortality, 5 but data on the overall effects of noninvasive ventilation with respect to the prevention of intubation and improvement in outcome are conflicting. 6 – 10 Previous studies have often included a heterogeneous population of patients with . . .

Background Awake prone positioning (APP) improves oxygenation in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients and, when successful, may decrease the risk of intubation. However, factors associated with APP success remain unknown. In this secondary analysis, we aimed to assess whether APP can reduce intubation rate in patients with COVID-19 and to focus on the factors associated with success. Methods In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, conducted in three high-acuity units, we randomly assigned patients with COVID-19-induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) requiring high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen to APP or standard care. Primary outcome was intubation rate at 28 days. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the predictors associated to treatment success (survival without intubation). Results Among 430 patients randomized, 216 were assigned to APP and 214 to standard care. The APP group had a lower intubation rate (30% vs 43%, relative risk [RR] 0.70; CI 95 0.54–0.90, P  = 0.006) and shorter hospital length of stay (11 interquartile range [IQR, 9–14] vs 13 [IQR, 10–17] days, P  = 0.001). A respiratory rate ≤ 25 bpm at enrollment, an increase in ROX index > 1.25 after first APP session, APP duration > 8 h/day, and a decrease in lung ultrasound score ≥ 2 within the first 3 days were significantly associated with treatment success for APP. Conclusion In patients with COVID-19-induced AHRF treated by HFNC, APP reduced intubation rate and improved treatment success. A longer APP duration is associated with APP success, while the increase in ROX index and decrease in lung ultrasound score after APP can also help identify patients most likely to benefit. Trial registration : This study was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov at July 20, 2021. Identification number NCT04477655. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04477655?term=PRO-CARF&draw=2&rank=1

In this study, patients treated in ICUs were at high risk for new cognitive impairment during 12 months of follow-up, with 24% of patients having deficits similar in severity to those in Alzheimer's disease. A longer duration of delirium was associated with worse cognitive scores. Survivors of critical illness frequently have a prolonged and poorly understood form of cognitive dysfunction, 1 – 4 which is characterized by new deficits (or exacerbations of preexisting mild deficits) in global cognition or executive function. This long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness may be a growing public health problem, given the large number of acutely ill patients being treated in intensive care units (ICUs) globally. 5 Among older adults, cognitive decline is associated with institutionalization, 6 hospitalization, 7 and considerable annual societal costs. 8 , 9 Yet little is known about the epidemiology of long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. Delirium, a form of acute brain . . .

BackgroundPatients with obesity are at increased risk of severe COVID-19, requiring mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure. However, conflicting data are obtained for intensive care unit (ICU) mortality.ObjectiveTo analyze the relationship between obesity and in-hospital mortality of ICU patients with COVID-19.Subjects/methodsPatients admitted to the ICU for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were included retrospectively. The following data were collected: comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), the severity of ARDS assessed with PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratios, disease severity measured by the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), management and outcomes.ResultsFor a total of 222 patients, there were 34 patients (15.3%) with normal BMI, 92 patients (41.4%) who were overweight, 80 patients (36%) with moderate obesity (BMI:30–39.9 kg/m2), and 16 patients (7.2%) with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2). Overall in-hospital mortality was 20.3%. Patients with moderate obesity had a lower mortality rate (13.8%) than patients with normal weight, overweight or severe obesity (17.6%, 21.7%, and 50%, respectively; P = 0.011. Logistic regression showed that patients with a BMI ≤ 29 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR] 3.64, 95% CI 1.38–9.60) and those with a BMI > 39 kg/m2 (OR 10.04, 95% CI 2.45–41.09) had a higher risk of mortality than those with a BMI from 29 to 39 kg/m2. The number of comorbidities (≥2), SAPS II score, and P/F < 100 mmHg were also independent predictors for in-hospital mortality.ConclusionsCOVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU with moderate obesity had a lower risk of death than the other patients, suggesting a possible obesity paradox.

To describe the trajectory of respiratory failure in COVID-19 and explore factors associated with risk of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). A retrospective, observational cohort study of 112 inpatient adults diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 12 and April 16, 2020. Data were manually extracted from electronic medical records. Multivariable and Univariable regression were used to evaluate association between baseline characteristics, initial serum markers and the outcome of IMV. Our cohort had median age of 61 (IQR 45-74) and was 66% male. In-hospital mortality was 6% (7/112). ICU mortality was 12.8% (6/47), and 18% (5/28) for those requiring IMV. Obesity (OR 5.82, CI 1.74-19.48), former (OR 8.06, CI 1.51-43.06) and current smoking status (OR 10.33, CI 1.43-74.67) were associated with IMV after adjusting for age, sex, and high prevalence comorbidities by multivariable analysis. Initial absolute lymphocyte count (OR 0.33, CI 0.11-0.96), procalcitonin (OR 1.27, CI 1.02-1.57), IL-6 (OR 1.17, CI 1.03-1.33), ferritin (OR 1.05, CI 1.005-1.11), LDH (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.17) and CRP (OR 1.13, CI 1.06-1.21), were associated with IMV by univariate analysis. Obesity, smoking history, and elevated inflammatory markers were associated with increased need for IMV in patients with COVID-19.

Venus et al discuss the prone positioning for patients with hypoxic respiratory failure related to COVID-19. Pneumonia is the most common reason for admission to hospital among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and many such patients will require supplemental oxygen. Prone positioning has been widely adopted into standard practice for patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome who are mechanically ventilated based on high quality evidence. Prone positioning in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure who are awake, spontaneously breathing and not intubated is possible in noncritical care settings; evidence has emerged of its use in the management of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, showing potential for improved oxygenation and decreased dyspnea.