Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens: living systematic review with network meta-analysis
by
Au, Wing Ying
, Cheung, Peter Pak-Hang
in
Aged
/ Bias
/ Clinical trials
/ Coronaviruses
/ COVID-19 - epidemiology
/ COVID-19 - prevention & control
/ COVID-19 Vaccines
/ Death
/ Ethnicity
/ Humans
/ Intervention
/ Meta-analysis
/ mRNA
/ mRNA Vaccines
/ RNA, Messenger
/ SARS-CoV-2
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Systematic review
/ Vaccine efficacy
/ Vaccines, Synthetic
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens: living systematic review with network meta-analysis
by
Au, Wing Ying
, Cheung, Peter Pak-Hang
in
Aged
/ Bias
/ Clinical trials
/ Coronaviruses
/ COVID-19 - epidemiology
/ COVID-19 - prevention & control
/ COVID-19 Vaccines
/ Death
/ Ethnicity
/ Humans
/ Intervention
/ Meta-analysis
/ mRNA
/ mRNA Vaccines
/ RNA, Messenger
/ SARS-CoV-2
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Systematic review
/ Vaccine efficacy
/ Vaccines, Synthetic
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens: living systematic review with network meta-analysis
by
Au, Wing Ying
, Cheung, Peter Pak-Hang
in
Aged
/ Bias
/ Clinical trials
/ Coronaviruses
/ COVID-19 - epidemiology
/ COVID-19 - prevention & control
/ COVID-19 Vaccines
/ Death
/ Ethnicity
/ Humans
/ Intervention
/ Meta-analysis
/ mRNA
/ mRNA Vaccines
/ RNA, Messenger
/ SARS-CoV-2
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Systematic review
/ Vaccine efficacy
/ Vaccines, Synthetic
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens: living systematic review with network meta-analysis
Journal Article
Effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens: living systematic review with network meta-analysis
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens with and without boosting in preventing covid-19 related infection, hospital admission, and death.DesignLiving systematic review and network meta-analysis.Data sourcesWorld Health Organization covid-19 databases, including 38 sources of published studies and preprints.Study selectionRandomised controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies.Methods38 WHO covid-19 databases were searched on a weekly basis from 8 March 2022 to 31 July 2022. Studies that assessed the effectiveness of heterologous and homologous covid-19 vaccine regimens with or without a booster were identified. Studies were eligible when they reported the number of documented, symptomatic, severe covid-19 infections, covid-19 related hospital admissions, or covid-19 related deaths among populations that were vaccinated and unvaccinated. The primary measure was vaccine effectiveness calculated as 1−odds ratio. Secondary measures were surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) scores and the relative effects for pairwise comparisons. The risk of bias was evaluated by using the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for all cohort and case-control studies. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (version 2; ROB-2) was used to assess randomised controlled trials.ResultsThe second iteration of the analysis comprised 63 studies. 25 combinations of covid-19 vaccine regimens were identified, of which three doses of mRNA vaccine were found to be 93% (95% credible interval 70% to 98%) effective against asymptomatic or symptomatic covid-19 infections for non-delta or non-omicron related infections. Heterologous boosting using two dose adenovirus vector vaccines with one dose mRNA vaccine showed a vaccine effectiveness of 94% (72% to 99%) against non-delta or non-omicron related asymptomatic or symptomatic infections. Three doses of mRNA vaccine were found to be the most effective in reducing non-delta or non-omicron related hospital admission (96%, 82% to 99%). The vaccine effectiveness against death in people who received three doses of mRNA vaccine remains uncertain owing to confounders. The estimate for a four dose mRNA vaccine regimen was of low certainty, as only one study on the effectiveness of four doses could be included in this update. More evidence on four dose regimens will be needed to accurately assess the effectiveness of a fourth vaccine dose. For people with delta or omicron related infection, a two dose regimen of an adenovirus vector vaccine with one dose of mRNA booster was 77% (42% to 91%) effective against asymptomatic or symptomatic covid-19 infections, and a three dose regimen of a mRNA vaccine was 93% (76% to 98%) effective against covid-19 related hospital admission.ConclusionAn mRNA booster is recommended to supplement any primary vaccine course. Heterologous and homologous three dose regimens work comparably well in preventing covid-19 infections, even against different variants. The effectiveness of three dose vaccine regimens against covid-19 related death remains uncertain.Systematic review registrationThis review was not registered. The protocol is included in the supplementary document.Readers’ noteThis article is a living systematic review that will be updated to reflect emerging evidence. Updates may occur for up to two years from the date of original publication. This version is update 1 of the original article published on 31 May 2022 (BMJ 2022;377:e069989), and previous versions can be found as data supplements (https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2022-069989/related). When citing this paper please consider adding the version number and date of access for clarity.
Publisher
British Medical Journal Publishing Group,BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.