Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Predictors of anastomotic strictures following œsophageal atresia repair
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Predictors of anastomotic strictures following œsophageal atresia repair
Do you wish to request the book?
Predictors of anastomotic strictures following œsophageal atresia repair
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Predictors of anastomotic strictures following œsophageal atresia repair
2022
Overview
ObjectivesTo identify the risk factors for anastomotic, refractory and recurrent strictures and to establish whether anastomotic stricture is associated with antireflux surgery.DesignThis prospective national multicentre study included all infants born with oesophageal atresia (OA) over an 8-year period. Data on OA and complications were collected at birth and at 1 year old. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.Results1082 patients from 37 centres were included in the study. The prevalence of anastomotic stricture at 1 year old was 23.2%. Anastomosis under tension (defined by the surgeon at the time of repair) and delayed anastomosis (defined as anastomosis performed more than 15 days after birth, excluding delays due to prematurity or severe cardiac diseases) were found to be independent risk factors for anastomotic stricture (2.3 (1.42–3.74) and 4.02 (2.12–7.63), respectively). Patients with anastomotic stricture had a 2.3-fold higher rate of fundoplication compared with others (p=0.001). Anastomosis under tension and delayed anastomosis were found to be independent risk factors for recurrent stricture (1.92 (1.10–3.34) and 5.73 (2.71–12.14), respectively), while delayed anastomosis was the only risk factor for refractory stricture (8.30 (3.34–20.64)). There was a 2.39-fold (1.42–4.04) higher rate of fundoplication in the anastomotic stricture group than in the group without anastomotic stricture (p=0.001).ConclusionsPatient-related anatomical factors leading to anastomosis under tension and delayed anastomosis increase the risk of anastomotic stricture.
