Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Authors’ reply to ‘assessments of the performance of pandemic preparedness measures must properly account for national income
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Authors’ reply to ‘assessments of the performance of pandemic preparedness measures must properly account for national income
Do you wish to request the book?
Authors’ reply to ‘assessments of the performance of pandemic preparedness measures must properly account for national income
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Authors’ reply to ‘assessments of the performance of pandemic preparedness measures must properly account for national income
2024
Overview
Understanding the role of pandemic preparedness during the COVID-19 crisis is challenging considering substantial cross-country gaps in data sources, heterogeneity in reporting of COVID-19 outcomes and differences in population age structures and healthcare delivery systems. [...]this may be the most well-specified model considering that the residuals are substantially closer to being constant (studentised Breusch-Pagan (BPT=6.91; p=0.075)). Table 1 Country-level effect sizes of 2021 Global Health Security measures on comparative excess mortality ratio Coefficient (95% CI) P value Global Health Security Score −0.17 (−0.32 to −0.03) 0.0168* Prevention score −0.07 (−0.17 to 0.03) 0.1580 Detection score −0.09 (−0.16 to −0.02) 0.0187* Response score −0.11 (−0.27 to 0.04) 0.1612 Health system score −0.06 (−0.18 to 0.06) 0.3086 International norms score −0.13 (−0.26 to −0.01) 0.0407* Risk environment score −0.25 (−0.40 to −0.10) 0.0014* Effect sizes compare a 5-score difference in each index. [...]taking into account age likely already adjusts for a substantial proportion of country-level income considering the very strong correlation between log income and fraction of population 65 years and greater in 2019 (Pearson’s r=0.74).
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
Subject
