Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
by
Hardy, Pollyanna
, Battersby, Cheryl
, Marcroft, Claire
, Boardman, James P
, Gallagher, Katie
, Dorling, Jon
, Dinwiddy, Kate
, Mactier, Helen
, Gale, Chris
, Carroll, William D
, Webbe, James
, Boyle, Elaine M
, Evans, Katie
, Johnston, Emma
in
Academies and Institutes
/ Childrens health
/ Clinical trials
/ Communication
/ Consensus
/ Delphi Technique
/ Female
/ Health Priorities
/ Humans
/ Identification
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Medicine
/ Neonatal care
/ neonatal intensive & critical care
/ Neonatal nursing
/ neonatology
/ Newborn babies
/ Nurses
/ Paediatrics
/ Parents & parenting
/ Patients
/ Pediatrics
/ Pregnancy
/ Professionals
/ protocols & guidelines
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ Social networks
/ Stakeholders
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ United Kingdom
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
by
Hardy, Pollyanna
, Battersby, Cheryl
, Marcroft, Claire
, Boardman, James P
, Gallagher, Katie
, Dorling, Jon
, Dinwiddy, Kate
, Mactier, Helen
, Gale, Chris
, Carroll, William D
, Webbe, James
, Boyle, Elaine M
, Evans, Katie
, Johnston, Emma
in
Academies and Institutes
/ Childrens health
/ Clinical trials
/ Communication
/ Consensus
/ Delphi Technique
/ Female
/ Health Priorities
/ Humans
/ Identification
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Medicine
/ Neonatal care
/ neonatal intensive & critical care
/ Neonatal nursing
/ neonatology
/ Newborn babies
/ Nurses
/ Paediatrics
/ Parents & parenting
/ Patients
/ Pediatrics
/ Pregnancy
/ Professionals
/ protocols & guidelines
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ Social networks
/ Stakeholders
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ United Kingdom
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
by
Hardy, Pollyanna
, Battersby, Cheryl
, Marcroft, Claire
, Boardman, James P
, Gallagher, Katie
, Dorling, Jon
, Dinwiddy, Kate
, Mactier, Helen
, Gale, Chris
, Carroll, William D
, Webbe, James
, Boyle, Elaine M
, Evans, Katie
, Johnston, Emma
in
Academies and Institutes
/ Childrens health
/ Clinical trials
/ Communication
/ Consensus
/ Delphi Technique
/ Female
/ Health Priorities
/ Humans
/ Identification
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Medicine
/ Neonatal care
/ neonatal intensive & critical care
/ Neonatal nursing
/ neonatology
/ Newborn babies
/ Nurses
/ Paediatrics
/ Parents & parenting
/ Patients
/ Pediatrics
/ Pregnancy
/ Professionals
/ protocols & guidelines
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ Social networks
/ Stakeholders
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ United Kingdom
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
Journal Article
National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
IntroductionMethodologically robust clinical trials are required to improve neonatal care and reduce unwanted variations in practice. Previous neonatal research prioritisation processes have identified important research themes rather than specific research questions amenable to clinical trials. Practice-changing trials require well-defined research questions, commonly organised using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) structure. By narrowing the scope of research priorities to those which can be answered in clinical trials and by involving a wide range of different stakeholders, we aim to provide a robust and transparent process to identify and prioritise research questions answerable within the National Healthcare System to inform future practice-changing clinical trials.Methods and analysisA steering group comprising parents, doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, researchers and representatives from key organisations (Neonatal Society, British Association of Perinatal Medicine, Neonatal Nurses Association and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health) was identified to oversee this project. We will invite submissions of research questions formatted using the PICO structure from the following stakeholder groups using an online questionnaire: parents, patients, healthcare professionals and academic researchers. Unanswered, non-duplicate research questions will be entered into a three-round eDelphi survey of all stakeholder groups. Research questions will be ranked by mean aggregate scores.Ethics and disseminationThe final list of prioritised research questions will be disseminated through traditional academic channels, directly to key stakeholder groups through representative organisations and on social media. The outcome of the project will be shared with key research organisations such as the National Institute for Health Research. Research ethics committee approval is not required.
Publisher
British Medical Journal Publishing Group,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.