Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Should age matter in COVID-19 triage? A deliberative study
by
Kuylen, Margot N I
, Kim, Scott Y
, Ruck Keene, Alexander
, Owen, Gareth S
in
Age
/ Clinical decision making
/ Coronaviruses
/ COVID-19
/ COVID-19 current controversies
/ Current Controversy
/ Decision making
/ Democracy
/ Egalitarianism
/ Employment
/ Equality
/ Ethics
/ Frailty
/ General public
/ Health care industry
/ Health services
/ Legitimacy
/ Medical ethics
/ Occupations
/ Older people
/ Pandemics
/ Patients
/ Principles
/ Quality of life
/ Residential care
/ resource allocation
/ Scarcity
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Triage
/ Vulnerability
/ Workshops
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Should age matter in COVID-19 triage? A deliberative study
by
Kuylen, Margot N I
, Kim, Scott Y
, Ruck Keene, Alexander
, Owen, Gareth S
in
Age
/ Clinical decision making
/ Coronaviruses
/ COVID-19
/ COVID-19 current controversies
/ Current Controversy
/ Decision making
/ Democracy
/ Egalitarianism
/ Employment
/ Equality
/ Ethics
/ Frailty
/ General public
/ Health care industry
/ Health services
/ Legitimacy
/ Medical ethics
/ Occupations
/ Older people
/ Pandemics
/ Patients
/ Principles
/ Quality of life
/ Residential care
/ resource allocation
/ Scarcity
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Triage
/ Vulnerability
/ Workshops
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Should age matter in COVID-19 triage? A deliberative study
by
Kuylen, Margot N I
, Kim, Scott Y
, Ruck Keene, Alexander
, Owen, Gareth S
in
Age
/ Clinical decision making
/ Coronaviruses
/ COVID-19
/ COVID-19 current controversies
/ Current Controversy
/ Decision making
/ Democracy
/ Egalitarianism
/ Employment
/ Equality
/ Ethics
/ Frailty
/ General public
/ Health care industry
/ Health services
/ Legitimacy
/ Medical ethics
/ Occupations
/ Older people
/ Pandemics
/ Patients
/ Principles
/ Quality of life
/ Residential care
/ resource allocation
/ Scarcity
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Triage
/ Vulnerability
/ Workshops
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Should age matter in COVID-19 triage? A deliberative study
Journal Article
Should age matter in COVID-19 triage? A deliberative study
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The COVID-19 pandemic put a large burden on many healthcare systems, causing fears about resource scarcity and triage. Several COVID-19 guidelines included age as an explicit factor and practices of both triage and ‘anticipatory triage’ likely limited access to hospital care for elderly patients, especially those in care homes. To ensure the legitimacy of triage guidelines, which affect the public, it is important to engage the public’s moral intuitions. Our study aimed to explore general public views in the UK on the role of age, and related factors like frailty and quality of life, in triage during the COVID-19 pandemic. We held online deliberative workshops with members of the general public (n=22). Participants were guided through a deliberative process to maximise eliciting informed and considered preferences. Participants generally accepted the need for triage but strongly rejected ‘fair innings’ and ‘life projects’ principles as justifications for age-based allocation. They were also wary of the ‘maximise life-years’ principle, preferring to maximise the number of lives rather than life years saved. Although they did not arrive at a unified recommendation of one principle, a concern for three core principles and values eventually emerged: equality, efficiency and vulnerability. While these remain difficult to fully respect at once, they captured a considered, multifaceted consensus: utilitarian considerations of efficiency should be tempered with a concern for equality and vulnerability. This ‘triad’ of ethical principles may be a useful structure to guide ethical deliberation as societies negotiate the conflicting ethical demands of triage.
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics,BMJ,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.