Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparing transient and steady-state methods for the thermal conductivity characterization of a borehole heat exchanger field in Bergen, Norway
by
Verdoya, Massimo
, Wheeler, Walter H
, Giordano, Nicolò
, Mandrone, Giuseppe
, Chicco, Jessica
in
Anisotropy
/ Boreholes
/ Calcite
/ Carbonates
/ Comparative analysis
/ Comparative studies
/ Density
/ Divergence
/ Heat conductivity
/ Heat exchangers
/ Heat transfer
/ Heterogeneity
/ Methods
/ Micas
/ Mineral composition
/ Rock
/ Rocks
/ Sample preparation
/ Sediment samples
/ Seismic wave velocities
/ Silicates
/ Specimen preparation
/ Steady state
/ Thermal conductivity
/ Thermal resistance
/ Thermodynamic properties
/ Uncertainty
/ Velocity
/ Wave velocity
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparing transient and steady-state methods for the thermal conductivity characterization of a borehole heat exchanger field in Bergen, Norway
by
Verdoya, Massimo
, Wheeler, Walter H
, Giordano, Nicolò
, Mandrone, Giuseppe
, Chicco, Jessica
in
Anisotropy
/ Boreholes
/ Calcite
/ Carbonates
/ Comparative analysis
/ Comparative studies
/ Density
/ Divergence
/ Heat conductivity
/ Heat exchangers
/ Heat transfer
/ Heterogeneity
/ Methods
/ Micas
/ Mineral composition
/ Rock
/ Rocks
/ Sample preparation
/ Sediment samples
/ Seismic wave velocities
/ Silicates
/ Specimen preparation
/ Steady state
/ Thermal conductivity
/ Thermal resistance
/ Thermodynamic properties
/ Uncertainty
/ Velocity
/ Wave velocity
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparing transient and steady-state methods for the thermal conductivity characterization of a borehole heat exchanger field in Bergen, Norway
by
Verdoya, Massimo
, Wheeler, Walter H
, Giordano, Nicolò
, Mandrone, Giuseppe
, Chicco, Jessica
in
Anisotropy
/ Boreholes
/ Calcite
/ Carbonates
/ Comparative analysis
/ Comparative studies
/ Density
/ Divergence
/ Heat conductivity
/ Heat exchangers
/ Heat transfer
/ Heterogeneity
/ Methods
/ Micas
/ Mineral composition
/ Rock
/ Rocks
/ Sample preparation
/ Sediment samples
/ Seismic wave velocities
/ Silicates
/ Specimen preparation
/ Steady state
/ Thermal conductivity
/ Thermal resistance
/ Thermodynamic properties
/ Uncertainty
/ Velocity
/ Wave velocity
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparing transient and steady-state methods for the thermal conductivity characterization of a borehole heat exchanger field in Bergen, Norway
Journal Article
Comparing transient and steady-state methods for the thermal conductivity characterization of a borehole heat exchanger field in Bergen, Norway
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
A comparative study was carried out aiming at characterizing the thermal conductivity of rocks sampled in a borehole heat exchanger field. Twenty-three samples were analysed with four different methods based on both steady-state and transient approaches: transient divided bar (TDB), transient line source (TLS), optical scanning (OS), and guarded hot plate (GHP). Moreover, mineral composition (from XRD analyses), P-wave velocity, and density were investigated to assess the petro-physical heterogeneity and to investigate possible causes of divergence between the methods. The results of thermal conductivity showed that TLS systematically underestimates thermal conductivity on rock samples by 10–30% compared to the other devices. The differences between TDB and OS, and GHP and OS are smaller (about 6% and 10%, respectively). The average deviation between TDB and GHP, for which the specimen preparation and the measurement procedure were similar, is about 10%. In general, the differences are ascribable to sample preparation, heterogeneity and anisotropy of the rocks, and contact thermal resistance, rather than the intrinsic accuracy of the device. In case of good-quality and homogeneous samples, uncertainty can be as low as 5%, but, due to the above-mentioned factors, usually uncertainty is as large as 10%. Opposite relationships between thermal conductivity and P-wave velocity were observed when analysing parallel and perpendicular to the main rock foliation. Perpendicular conductivity values grow with increasing perpendicular sonic velocity, while parallel values exhibit an inverse trend. Thermal conductivity also appears to be inversely correlated to density. In quartz-rich samples, high thermal conductivity and low density were observed. In samples with calcite or other likely dense mineral phases, we noticed that lower thermal conductivity corresponds to higher density. The presence of micas is likely to mask major differences between silicate and carbonate samples.
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.