Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the \Endowment Effect,\ Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the \Endowment Effect,\ Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment
Do you wish to request the book?
The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the \Endowment Effect,\ Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the \Endowment Effect,\ Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment
2011
Overview
Plott and Zeiler (2005) report that the willingness-to-pay/willingness-to-accept disparity is absent for mugs in a particular experimental setting, designed to neutralize misconceptions about the procedures used to elicit valuations. This result has received sustained attention in the literature. However, other data from that same study, not published in that paper, exhibit a significant and persistent disparity when the same experimental procedures are applied to lotteries. We report new data confirming both results, thereby suggesting that the presence or absence of a disparity may be a more complex issue than some may have supposed. (JEL C91, D12, D81, D83)
