Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Ideological Codependency and Regional Order: Iran, Syria, and the Axis of Refusal
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Ideological Codependency and Regional Order: Iran, Syria, and the Axis of Refusal
Do you wish to request the book?
Ideological Codependency and Regional Order: Iran, Syria, and the Axis of Refusal
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Ideological Codependency and Regional Order: Iran, Syria, and the Axis of Refusal
2017
Overview
With exceptions, \"identity\" has eclipsed \"ideology\" as an analytical category in scholarship on the Middle East since the end of the Cold War (Haugbolle 2016). Ideological power constitutes a fundamental currency in both domestic politics and IR, with the interrelationship between the two often obscured by a narrower focus on ideology as a source of legitimacy, shaper of perception or foreign-policy resource (i.e., soft power). [...]the article engages directly with issues of identity in IR, specifically by integrating ideology as a category of analysis. Examples include work on coalitions and regional security (Buzan and Wæver 2003; Solingen 1998, 2015), neoclassical realism (Juneau 2015), role theory (Cantir and Kaarbo 2012; Fernandez-Molina 2015), the role of ideology in alliances and conflict (Haas 2012; Owen 2010, 2015; Rubin 2014), the foreign policy of authoritarian states (Colgan and Weeks 2015; Kanat 2014; Odinius and Kuntz 2015; Weeks 2012), and constructivist approaches to foreign policy and regional order (Barnett 1998; Telhami and Barnett 2002). [...]although some scholars explain divergent outlooks with reference to historical processes of state formation (Solingen 2015), such an explanation is provided as background rather than theorized as an integral and ongoing influence on foreign policy and regional order. IDEATIONAL FACTORS IN FOREIGN POLICY AND IR Ideology lies at the core of modernity, in which political power depends on the consent and support of putatively sovereign publics, not only the possession of material resources (i.e., economic and military) (Gramsci 1971; Mann 1986). [...]World Quarterly 37 (5 ): 917 -33.10.1080/01436597.2015.1113872 Juneau Thomas ...
