Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A hierarchical anatomical framework and workflow for organizing stereotactic encephalography in epilepsy
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A hierarchical anatomical framework and workflow for organizing stereotactic encephalography in epilepsy
Do you wish to request the book?
A hierarchical anatomical framework and workflow for organizing stereotactic encephalography in epilepsy
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A hierarchical anatomical framework and workflow for organizing stereotactic encephalography in epilepsy
2022
Overview
Stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) is an increasingly utilized method for invasive monitoring in patients with medically intractable epilepsy. Yet, the lack of standardization for labeling electrodes hinders communication among clinicians. A rational clustering of contacts based on anatomy rather than arbitrary physical leads may help clinical neurophysiologists interpret seizure networks. We identified SEEG electrodes on post‐implant CTs and registered them to preoperative MRIs segmented according to an anatomical atlas. Individual contacts were automatically assigned to anatomical areas independent of lead. These contacts were then organized using a hierarchical anatomical schema for display and interpretation. Bipolar‐referenced signal cross‐correlations were used to compare the similarity of grouped signals within a conventional montage versus this anatomical montage. As a result, we developed a hierarchical organization for SEEG contacts using well‐accepted, free software that is based solely on their post‐implant anatomical location. When applied to three example SEEG cases for epilepsy, clusters of contacts that were anatomically related collapsed into standardized groups. Qualitatively, seizure events organized using this framework were better visually clustered compared to conventional schemes. Quantitatively, signals grouped by anatomical region were more similar to each other than electrode‐based groups as measured by Pearson correlation. Further, we uploaded visualizations of SEEG reconstructions into the electronic medical record, rendering them durably useful given the interpretable electrode labels. In conclusion, we demonstrate a standardized, anatomically grounded approach to the organization of SEEG neuroimaging and electrophysiology data that may enable improved communication among and across surgical epilepsy teams and promote a clearer view of individual seizure networks. We developed a hierarchical organization for SEEG contacts using well‐accepted, free software that is based solely on their post‐implant anatomical location. Qualitatively, seizure events organized using this framework were better visually clustered compared to conventional schemes. Quantitatively, signals grouped by anatomical region were more similar to each other than electrode‐based groups as measured by Pearson correlation.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subject
