Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Optimization of fixative solution for retinal morphology: a comparison with Davidson’s fixative and other fixation solutions
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Optimization of fixative solution for retinal morphology: a comparison with Davidson’s fixative and other fixation solutions
Do you wish to request the book?
Optimization of fixative solution for retinal morphology: a comparison with Davidson’s fixative and other fixation solutions
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Optimization of fixative solution for retinal morphology: a comparison with Davidson’s fixative and other fixation solutions
2018
Overview
Purpose
Numerous fixative solutions are available but many are not amenable to the histomorphological preservation of retinae. The investigators specifically focused on retinal histological studies, which rather than 4% formaldehyde (FA), often use Davidson’s fixative. However the latter has its limitations. The purpose of this study was to produce a new fixative which maintains retinae closer to the
in vivo
conditions.
Study design
Experimental design.
Methods
Four fixative formulations (4% paraformaldehyde, Davidson’s fixative, modified Davidson’s fixative and an in-house fixative – TB-Fix) were tested on retinae and the outcomes on histomorphology and immunohistochemical staining for selected antigenic markers was compared.
Results
TB-Fix markedly improved morphological detail following hematoxylin and eosin staining, most importantly eliminating the spongiform appearance in the plexiform layer and the swelling of somata (including Müller cells), when compared to FA, Davidson’s fixative and its modified version. Retinal samples fixed with TB-Fix or FA showed comparable results in immunohistological staining for neurons and glia in the retina. Importantly, while the whole eye fixed with FA collapsed in shape and induced artificial retinal detachment, the eye fixed with TB-Fix avoided deformation and detachment. Furthermore, we found that TB-Fix also prevented detachment from the culture plate when used to fix HEK293 cells, which are known to detach from the plate easily.
Conclusion
It was demonstrated that TB-Fix provides an overall improvement in the preservation of retinal morphology and chemical composition.
