Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Factors influencing experimental estimation of scavenger removal and observer detection in bird–window collision surveys
by
Riding, Corey S.
, Loss, Scott R.
in
Anthropogenic factors
/ avian mortality
/ bias estimates
/ Birds
/ bird–window collisions
/ Cameras
/ carcass persistence
/ carcass surveys
/ Carcasses
/ cats
/ Collision mortality
/ Collisions
/ death
/ Didelphis virginiana
/ Domestic animals
/ Human influences
/ monitoring
/ Mortality
/ mortality surveys
/ observer detection
/ Oklahoma
/ Polls & surveys
/ scavengers
/ Scavenging
/ searcher efficiency
/ Species
/ Substrates
/ surveys
/ Wildlife
2018
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Factors influencing experimental estimation of scavenger removal and observer detection in bird–window collision surveys
by
Riding, Corey S.
, Loss, Scott R.
in
Anthropogenic factors
/ avian mortality
/ bias estimates
/ Birds
/ bird–window collisions
/ Cameras
/ carcass persistence
/ carcass surveys
/ Carcasses
/ cats
/ Collision mortality
/ Collisions
/ death
/ Didelphis virginiana
/ Domestic animals
/ Human influences
/ monitoring
/ Mortality
/ mortality surveys
/ observer detection
/ Oklahoma
/ Polls & surveys
/ scavengers
/ Scavenging
/ searcher efficiency
/ Species
/ Substrates
/ surveys
/ Wildlife
2018
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Factors influencing experimental estimation of scavenger removal and observer detection in bird–window collision surveys
by
Riding, Corey S.
, Loss, Scott R.
in
Anthropogenic factors
/ avian mortality
/ bias estimates
/ Birds
/ bird–window collisions
/ Cameras
/ carcass persistence
/ carcass surveys
/ Carcasses
/ cats
/ Collision mortality
/ Collisions
/ death
/ Didelphis virginiana
/ Domestic animals
/ Human influences
/ monitoring
/ Mortality
/ mortality surveys
/ observer detection
/ Oklahoma
/ Polls & surveys
/ scavengers
/ Scavenging
/ searcher efficiency
/ Species
/ Substrates
/ surveys
/ Wildlife
2018
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Factors influencing experimental estimation of scavenger removal and observer detection in bird–window collision surveys
Journal Article
Factors influencing experimental estimation of scavenger removal and observer detection in bird–window collision surveys
2018
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Wildlife collisions with human-built structures are a major source of direct anthropogenic mortality. Understanding and mitigating the impact of anthropogenic collisions on wildlife populations require unbiased mortality estimates. However, counts of collision fatalities are underestimated due to several bias sources, including scavenger removal of carcasses between fatality surveys and imperfect detection of carcasses present during surveys. These biases remain particularly understudied for bird–window collisions, the largest source of avian collision mortality. In Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA, we used bird carcasses collected during window collision monitoring to experimentally assess factors influencing scavenging and observer detection, and we employed trail cameras to characterize the scavenger community and timing of scavenging. We recorded nine scavenger species, but the domestic cat and Virginia opossum were responsible for 73% of known-species scavenging events. The most frequent scavenger species were primarily nocturnal, and 68% of scavenging events occurred at night. Scavenger species best predicted time to first scavenging event, season best predicted carcass persistence time, and both season and carcass size predicted whether any carcass remains persisted after scavenging. Our results also suggest that observer detection was influenced by substrate, with greater detection of carcasses on artificial substrates. Our findings related to scavenging timing have important implications for the unbiased estimation of collision mortality because the timing of peak scavenging relative to timing of peak mortality can substantially influence accuracy of adjusted mortality estimates. Further, the differences in correlates for time to first scavenging and time to carcass removal (i.e., persistence time) illustrate the importance of explicitly measuring these often-independent events that are frequently conflated in the anthropogenic mortality literature.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.