Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative Analysis of Low-Cost Portable Spectrophotometers for Colorimetric Accuracy on the RAL Design System Plus Color Calibration Target
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative Analysis of Low-Cost Portable Spectrophotometers for Colorimetric Accuracy on the RAL Design System Plus Color Calibration Target
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative Analysis of Low-Cost Portable Spectrophotometers for Colorimetric Accuracy on the RAL Design System Plus Color Calibration Target
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparative Analysis of Low-Cost Portable Spectrophotometers for Colorimetric Accuracy on the RAL Design System Plus Color Calibration Target
2024
Overview
Novel low-cost portable spectrophotometers could be an alternative to traditional spectrophotometers and calibrated RGB cameras by offering lower prices and convenient measurements but retaining high colorimetric accuracy. This study evaluated the colorimetric accuracy of low-cost, portable spectrophotometers on the established color calibration target—RAL Design System Plus (RAL+). Four spectrophotometers with a listed price between USD 100–1200 (Nix Spectro 2, Spectro 1 Pro, ColorReader, and Pico) and a smartphone RGB camera were tested on a representative subset of 183 RAL+ colors. Key performance metrics included the devices’ ability to match and measure RAL+ colors in the CIELAB color space using the color difference CIEDE2000 ΔE. The results showed that Nix Spectro 2 had the best performance, matching 99% of RAL+ colors with an estimated ΔE of 0.5–1.05. Spectro 1 Pro and ColorReader matched approximately 85% of colors with ΔE values between 1.07 and 1.39, while Pico and the Asus 8 smartphone matched 54–77% of colors, with ΔE of around 1.85. Our findings showed that low-cost, portable spectrophotometers offered excellent colorimetric measurements. They mostly outperformed existing RGB camera-based colorimetric systems, making them valuable tools in science and industry.
