Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Interactive Alignment or Complex Reasoning: Reciprocal Adaptation and Framing in Group Decision and Negotiation
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Interactive Alignment or Complex Reasoning: Reciprocal Adaptation and Framing in Group Decision and Negotiation
Do you wish to request the book?
Interactive Alignment or Complex Reasoning: Reciprocal Adaptation and Framing in Group Decision and Negotiation
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Interactive Alignment or Complex Reasoning: Reciprocal Adaptation and Framing in Group Decision and Negotiation
2014
Overview
The purpose of this paper is to explore how speakers enter each other’s reference frames during interactive decision-making and negotiation. It examines the relation between reciprocal adaptation, Interactive Alignment Theory and Theory of Theory-of-Mind by using ethno-methodological analysis of audio-recorded activities. The study concludes that problem reframing is affected by interactivity and led by discursive mechanisms such as reciprocal adaptation, which realize as two types of embodied, cognitive and emotional processing: interactive alignment and complex reasoning. The type of activity predicts the functions of cognitive processing. In strategic negotiations, such as plea bargains, interactive alignment realizes complex emotionally loaded Theory-of-Mind reasoning. In addition, the analysis indicates that the participation of a judge does not inhibit the anchoring effect but rather reinforces it interactively. The study suggests a tentative framework for analysis of framing by describing cognitive processing in terms of temporal, consciousness and communicative characteristics. Multi-functionality of discourse features demands careful study of context rather than assumption of linguistic-discursive functions.
Publisher
Springer Netherlands,Springer Nature B.V
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.