Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Blindfold Test: Helping to decide whether an effect reflects visual processing or higher-level judgment
by
van Buren, Benjamin F.
, Scholl, Brian J.
in
Adult
/ Animacy
/ Art galleries & museums
/ Behavioral Science and Psychology
/ Blindness
/ Causality
/ Cognition
/ Cognitive Psychology
/ Decision Making
/ Evidence
/ Experiments
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Impressions
/ Judgment
/ Justice
/ Laboratory Experiments
/ Male
/ Motion
/ Motion Perception
/ Pattern Recognition, Visual
/ Perceptions
/ Property
/ Psychology
/ Ratings & rankings
/ Reasoning
/ Researchers
/ Sample Size
/ Stimuli
/ Subjectivity
/ Tests
/ Visual Perception
/ Visual processing
/ Visual stimuli
/ Young Adult
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Blindfold Test: Helping to decide whether an effect reflects visual processing or higher-level judgment
by
van Buren, Benjamin F.
, Scholl, Brian J.
in
Adult
/ Animacy
/ Art galleries & museums
/ Behavioral Science and Psychology
/ Blindness
/ Causality
/ Cognition
/ Cognitive Psychology
/ Decision Making
/ Evidence
/ Experiments
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Impressions
/ Judgment
/ Justice
/ Laboratory Experiments
/ Male
/ Motion
/ Motion Perception
/ Pattern Recognition, Visual
/ Perceptions
/ Property
/ Psychology
/ Ratings & rankings
/ Reasoning
/ Researchers
/ Sample Size
/ Stimuli
/ Subjectivity
/ Tests
/ Visual Perception
/ Visual processing
/ Visual stimuli
/ Young Adult
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The Blindfold Test: Helping to decide whether an effect reflects visual processing or higher-level judgment
by
van Buren, Benjamin F.
, Scholl, Brian J.
in
Adult
/ Animacy
/ Art galleries & museums
/ Behavioral Science and Psychology
/ Blindness
/ Causality
/ Cognition
/ Cognitive Psychology
/ Decision Making
/ Evidence
/ Experiments
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Impressions
/ Judgment
/ Justice
/ Laboratory Experiments
/ Male
/ Motion
/ Motion Perception
/ Pattern Recognition, Visual
/ Perceptions
/ Property
/ Psychology
/ Ratings & rankings
/ Reasoning
/ Researchers
/ Sample Size
/ Stimuli
/ Subjectivity
/ Tests
/ Visual Perception
/ Visual processing
/ Visual stimuli
/ Young Adult
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The Blindfold Test: Helping to decide whether an effect reflects visual processing or higher-level judgment
Journal Article
The Blindfold Test: Helping to decide whether an effect reflects visual processing or higher-level judgment
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Experimenters often ask subjects to rate displays in terms of high-level visual properties, such as animacy. When do such studies measure subjects’ visual impressions, and when do they merely reflect their judgments that certain features
should
indicate animacy? Here we introduce the ‘Blindfold Test’ for helping to evaluate the evidence for whether an effect reflects perception or judgment. If the same effect can be obtained not only with visual displays but also by simply
describing
those displays, then subjects’ responses may reflect higher-level reasoning rather than visual processing—and so other evidence is needed in order to support a ‘perceptual’ interpretation. We applied the Blindfold Test to three past studies in which observers made subjective reports about what they were seeing. In the first two examples, subjects rated stimuli in terms of high-level properties: animacy and physical forces. In both cases, the key findings replicated even when the visual stimuli were replaced with (mere) descriptions, and we conclude that these studies cannot by themselves license conclusions about perception. In contrast, a third example (involving motion-induced blindness) passed the test: subjects produced very different responses when given descriptions of the displays, compared to the visual stimuli themselves—providing compelling evidence that the original responses did not merely reflect such higher-level reasoning. The Blindfold Test may thus help to constrain interpretations of the mental processes underlying certain experimental results—especially for studies of properties that can be apprehended by both seeing and thinking.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.