Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Development and validation of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Clinical Rehabilitation (USER)
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Development and validation of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Clinical Rehabilitation (USER)
Do you wish to request the book?
Development and validation of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Clinical Rehabilitation (USER)
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Development and validation of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Clinical Rehabilitation (USER)
2009
Overview
Objective: The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation (USER) is a measure of functional independence that covers physical functioning (mobility, self-care), cognitive functioning and additional domains of pain, fatigue and mood. USER is implemented in the Netherlands as a generic rehabilitation outcome measure. This article reports the development and psychometric characteristics of USER.
Design: (1) Inter-rater reliability study and (2) responsiveness study with measurements at admission and at discharge from clinical rehabilitation.
Setting: Three rehabilitation facilities in the Netherlands.
Patients: Rehabilitation inpatients (N = 319).
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main outcome measures: Effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) of USER scales were compared to those of the Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and to relevant scales of the SF-36.
Results: Inter-rater reliability of USER was satisfactory to good. Strong correlations were found between the physical and cognitive functioning scores of USER, the Barthel Index and FIM (0.84—0.94). Correlations between USER pain, fatigue and mood scores and SF-36 scores were also strong (0.58—0.84). Responsiveness of USER physical functioning (1.0—1.2) was very good and slightly better than responsiveness of the Barthel Index (0.9—1.1) and the FIM motor score (0.8—1.1). Responsiveness of the USER cognitive score was below standard (0.2—0.3), but better than responsiveness of the FIM cognitive scores (0.1—0.2).
Conclusions: USER is a reliable, valid and responsive measure of functional independence that can be used as an alternative for the FIM. The pain, fatigue and mood scores were adapted after this study and need additional validation.
