MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Value of digital PCR in the early diagnosis of sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Value of digital PCR in the early diagnosis of sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Value of digital PCR in the early diagnosis of sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Value of digital PCR in the early diagnosis of sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Value of digital PCR in the early diagnosis of sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Value of digital PCR in the early diagnosis of sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Value of digital PCR in the early diagnosis of sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal Article

Value of digital PCR in the early diagnosis of sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2022
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
We systematically assessed whether a digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) could detect pathogenic microorganisms in patients with sepsis early and accurately. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, CNKI, CBM, and Wanfang Data databases for eligible studies to compare the detection of pathogenic microorganisms in blood samples by digital PCR with the gold standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to evaluate bias risk, and a random-effects meta-analysis approach was used for sensitivity and specificity calculations. Among the eight articles, there were eight identified studies with a total of 1278 subjects. The pooled sensitivity of digital PCR was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85%–98%), the specificity was 87% (95% CI, 76%–94%), the positive likelihood ratio was 7.3 (95% CI, 3.8–14.2), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03–0.17), the positive predictive value was 84.7%, the negative predictive value was 89.2%, the diagnostic odds ratio was 105 (95% CI, 37–303), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95–1.00). Digital PCR can shorten the detection time of pathogenic microorganisms in patients with sepsis. Digital PCR can detect pathogenic microorganisms in patients with sepsis earlier than blood culture. Therefore, digital PCR can be used as a potential strategy for the detection of pathogenic microorganisms in patients with sepsis. •Digital PCR is an exciting and fairly new tool in the world of clinical infectious disease management.•It is important to keep evaluating its place and role in the diagnosis and management of infectious diseases.•This paper made a good attempt at evaluating the currently available literature by using a meta-analysis approach.