Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Assessment of regional and interannual variations in tropospheric ozone in chemical reanalyses
by
Koren, Gerbrand
, Prates, Lucas
, Qu, Zhen
, Kumar, Rajesh
, Tang, Xiao
, Inness, Antje
, Huijnen, Vincent
, Jones, Dylan B. A.
, Miyazaki, Kazuyuki
, Sekiya, Takashi
, Worden, Helen
, Cheng, William Y. Y.
in
Air pollution
/ Air quality
/ Analysis
/ Annual variations
/ Atmospheric chemistry
/ Atmospheric monitoring
/ Bias
/ Data assimilation
/ Emissions
/ Interannual variations
/ Ozone
/ Ozonesondes
/ Pollutants
/ Regional analysis
/ Regional planning
/ Stratosphere
/ Troposphere
/ Tropospheric chemistry
/ Tropospheric ozone
/ Variation
/ VOCs
/ Volatile organic compounds
2026
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Assessment of regional and interannual variations in tropospheric ozone in chemical reanalyses
by
Koren, Gerbrand
, Prates, Lucas
, Qu, Zhen
, Kumar, Rajesh
, Tang, Xiao
, Inness, Antje
, Huijnen, Vincent
, Jones, Dylan B. A.
, Miyazaki, Kazuyuki
, Sekiya, Takashi
, Worden, Helen
, Cheng, William Y. Y.
in
Air pollution
/ Air quality
/ Analysis
/ Annual variations
/ Atmospheric chemistry
/ Atmospheric monitoring
/ Bias
/ Data assimilation
/ Emissions
/ Interannual variations
/ Ozone
/ Ozonesondes
/ Pollutants
/ Regional analysis
/ Regional planning
/ Stratosphere
/ Troposphere
/ Tropospheric chemistry
/ Tropospheric ozone
/ Variation
/ VOCs
/ Volatile organic compounds
2026
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Assessment of regional and interannual variations in tropospheric ozone in chemical reanalyses
by
Koren, Gerbrand
, Prates, Lucas
, Qu, Zhen
, Kumar, Rajesh
, Tang, Xiao
, Inness, Antje
, Huijnen, Vincent
, Jones, Dylan B. A.
, Miyazaki, Kazuyuki
, Sekiya, Takashi
, Worden, Helen
, Cheng, William Y. Y.
in
Air pollution
/ Air quality
/ Analysis
/ Annual variations
/ Atmospheric chemistry
/ Atmospheric monitoring
/ Bias
/ Data assimilation
/ Emissions
/ Interannual variations
/ Ozone
/ Ozonesondes
/ Pollutants
/ Regional analysis
/ Regional planning
/ Stratosphere
/ Troposphere
/ Tropospheric chemistry
/ Tropospheric ozone
/ Variation
/ VOCs
/ Volatile organic compounds
2026
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Assessment of regional and interannual variations in tropospheric ozone in chemical reanalyses
Journal Article
Assessment of regional and interannual variations in tropospheric ozone in chemical reanalyses
2026
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
We evaluate regional and interannual variations in tropospheric ozone in five global and regional chemical reanalyses, consisting of the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service reanalysis (CAMSRA), the second-generation Tropospheric Chemistry Reanalysis (TCR-2), the GEOS-Chem reanalysis, the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) regional analysis, and the Chinese air quality reanalysis (CAQRA). We find that there are large regional differences (about 10–15 nmol mol−1) in mean surface ozone between the reanalyses. GEOS-Chem has high ozone relative to the ensemble mean across most continental regions, whereas CAMSRA has low ozone. Comparison with surface ozone observations shows that the reanalyses are biased high relative to the observations, with surface ozone biases exceeding 10 nmol mol−1 in GEOS-Chem. We find that CAMSRA has the smallest bias with respect to the observations, with negative biases in Europe, and in the central and western US, and positive biases everywhere else. In the free troposphere the reanalyses are in good agreement, and the mean bias between the reanalyses and ozonesonde observations are small, less than 4 nmol mol−1 at 500 hPa. In addition, the correlations between the ozonesondes and the reanalyses are as high as 0.8 and 0.9 in the southern and northern midlatitudes respectively. The results suggest that chemical reanalyses should provide valuable information for quantifying variations in ozone in the free troposphere. However, to enhance the utility of the surface ozone analyses, improvements in the reanalyses are needed to better exploit assimilated observations to mitigate the impact of discrepancies in the model chemistry and ozone precursor emissions.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.