Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Quality of life and health status with zoledronic acid and generic alendronate—a secondary analysis of the Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study in postmenopausal women with low bone mass
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Quality of life and health status with zoledronic acid and generic alendronate—a secondary analysis of the Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study in postmenopausal women with low bone mass
Do you wish to request the book?
Quality of life and health status with zoledronic acid and generic alendronate—a secondary analysis of the Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study in postmenopausal women with low bone mass
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Quality of life and health status with zoledronic acid and generic alendronate—a secondary analysis of the Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study in postmenopausal women with low bone mass
2012
Overview
Summary
The ROSE study compared annual infusion with zoledronic acid and weekly generic alendronate. No significant differences in quality of life or health status between treatment groups were observed. Adherence to alendronate during the study was high, with 80.9% of patients achieving adequate adherence.
Introduction
A secondary analysis to evaluate quality of life, health status, adherence to alendronate and therapy preference in postmenopausal women with low bone mass who received treatment with zoledronic acid or alendronate was conducted.
Methods
Postmenopausal women with low bone mass were randomised 2:1 to receive an annual infusion of zoledronic acid or weekly oral generic alendronate in this open-label, multicentre study. Changes in quality of life and health status were assessed using questionnaires at baseline and month 12. Adherence to alendronate was assessed by the investigator and/or study personnel, and subjective therapy preference was assessed using a questionnaire at month 12.
Results
Patients were randomised to zoledronic acid (
n
= 408) and alendronate (
n
= 191). Overall, there were no significant differences in quality of life between zoledronic acid and alendronate. However, improvements in quality of life with zoledronic acid versus alendronate could be detected by posthoc analysis in patients with previous fractures. There were no significant differences in health status between patients receiving zoledronic acid or alendronate. Adherence to alendronate during the study was high, with 80.9% of patients achieving adequate adherence. A total of 81% of patients who had received zoledronic acid indicated that they would prefer to continue with that treatment, and 43% of the patients who received oral alendronate would like to switch to zoledronic acid.
Conclusions
There were no significant differences in quality of life between patients receiving zoledronic acid or alendronate.
Publisher
Springer-Verlag,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
/ Aged
/ Alendronate - administration & dosage
/ Alendronate - therapeutic use
/ Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration & dosage
/ Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use
/ Bones
/ Diphosphonates - administration & dosage
/ Diphosphonates - therapeutic use
/ Drug Administration Schedule
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Imidazoles - administration & dosage
/ Imidazoles - therapeutic use
/ Medicine
/ Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy
