MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves
Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves
Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves
Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves
Journal Article

Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves

2020
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The clinical and imaging differences between bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients with medically managed asymptomatic moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis (AS) have not been studied previously. We aim to characterize these differences and their clinical outcomes in this study. A retrospective observational study was conducted on 836 consecutive cases of isolated asymptomatic moderate-to-severe AS, with median follow-up of 3.4 years. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were compared between BAV and TAV patients. Subgroup analysis stratified by AS severity were performed. Survival analysis of all-cause mortality was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model. Compared to BAV patients, TAV patients were older (76 ± 11 vs 55 ± 16 years, p <0.001) and had more co-morbidities including hypertension (78% vs 56%; p <0.001), diabetes (41% vs 24%; p <0.001), and chronic kidney disease (20% vs 3%; p = 0.001). TAV patients had less severe aortic valve disease than BAV patients, with a higher aortic valve area index (0.71 ± 0.20 cm2/m2 vs 0.61 ± 0.18 cm2/m2, p <0.001) and less aortic dilation (sinotubular junction: 23.7 ± 4.0 mm vs 26.9 ± 4.8 mm, p <0.001; mid-ascending aorta: 31.4 ± 4.7 mm vs 36.3 ± 6.3 mm, p <0.001). TAV patients were more likely to have eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy and less likely to have a normal geometry (p = 0.003). Competing risk analysis identified increased age (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.05, p <0.001) and LVEF (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.97 to 0.99, p <0.001) as independent risk factors of all-cause mortality. Valve morphology was not a significant independent risk factor for aortic valve replacement or mortality. In conclusion, asymptomatic TAV patients had more cardiovascular risk factors, less severe aortic valve disease, less sinotubular and mid-ascending aortic dilation, more severe LV remodeling.
Publisher
Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited
Subject

Adult

/ Age Factors

/ Aged

/ Aged, 80 and over

/ Aorta

/ Aortic Diseases - diagnostic imaging

/ Aortic Diseases - epidemiology

/ Aortic Diseases - physiopathology

/ Aortic stenosis

/ Aortic valve

/ Aortic Valve - abnormalities

/ Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging

/ Aortic Valve - physiopathology

/ Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications

/ Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging

/ Aortic Valve Stenosis - epidemiology

/ Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology

/ Asymptomatic Diseases

/ Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease

/ Cardiovascular disease

/ Cardiovascular diseases

/ Case-Control Studies

/ Cause of Death

/ Confidence intervals

/ Diabetes

/ Diabetes mellitus

/ Dilatation, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging

/ Dilatation, Pathologic - epidemiology

/ Dilatation, Pathologic - physiopathology

/ Dilation

/ Echocardiography

/ Ejection fraction

/ Female

/ Geometry

/ Heart

/ Heart Valve Diseases - complications

/ Heart Valve Diseases - diagnostic imaging

/ Heart Valve Diseases - epidemiology

/ Heart Valve Diseases - physiopathology

/ Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - statistics & numerical data

/ Heart valves

/ Humans

/ Hypertension

/ Hypertrophy

/ Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular - diagnostic imaging

/ Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular - epidemiology

/ Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular - physiopathology

/ Kaplan-Meier Estimate

/ Kidney diseases

/ Male

/ Mathematical morphology

/ Middle Aged

/ Morbidity

/ Morphology

/ Mortality

/ Proportional Hazards Models

/ Retrospective Studies

/ Risk analysis

/ Risk Factors

/ Severity of Illness Index

/ Statistical models

/ Stenosis

/ Stroke

/ Stroke Volume

/ Subgroups

/ Survival analysis

/ Ventricle