Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Review of the existing maximum residue levels for diclofop (considered variant diclofop‐methyl) according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Review of the existing maximum residue levels for diclofop (considered variant diclofop‐methyl) according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005
Do you wish to request the book?
Review of the existing maximum residue levels for diclofop (considered variant diclofop‐methyl) according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Review of the existing maximum residue levels for diclofop (considered variant diclofop‐methyl) according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005
2020
Overview
According to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, EFSA has reviewed the maximum residue levels (MRLs) currently established at European level for the pesticide active substance diclofop. To assess the occurrence of diclofop residues in plants, processed commodities, rotational crops and livestock, EFSA considered the conclusions derived in the framework of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, as well as the European authorisations reported by Member States (including the supporting residues data). Based on the assessment of the available data, MRL proposals were derived and a consumer risk assessment was carried out. Although no apparent risk to consumers was identified, some information required by the regulatory framework was missing. Hence, the consumer risk assessment is considered indicative only and the MRL proposals derived by EFSA still require further consideration by risk managers.
