Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity Assemblages
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity Assemblages
Do you wish to request the book?
The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity Assemblages
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity Assemblages
2025
Overview
ABSTRACT
Stream periphyton is an ideal study system for explaining how dispersal shapes community patterns. Few studies have tried to investigate periphyton metacommunities at the reach scale, and studies comparing local versus upstream periphyton propagule sources are lacking. We aimed to address these knowledge gaps by disentangling environmental constraints and dispersal sources, including dispersal hypotheses related to periphyton functional guilds. We covered 25‐m sections of streambed with plastic silage cover sheets in three streams in Southern New Zealand, allowing river water to flow over the sheets. Samples on top of these sheets allowed periphyton colonisation only by drifting upstream propagules, while ‘control’ samples placed directly upstream of the plastic sheets were colonised by local and upstream propagules. We collected samples after 7, 14, and 25 days of colonisation. Response variables included periphyton biomass, community structure, and relative abundances of functional guilds. Control samples showed 1.5–6 times higher cell densities than plastic‐cover samples, suggesting that local colonisation is very important for biomass accrual. Periphyton communities on both tile types became more similar to each other with time, indicating that environmental filters overcame effects of colonisation sources. While motile and flagellated taxa showed the ability to reach their preferred microhabitats in all streams, the responses of the remaining functional guilds did not follow the expected patterns. We conclude that periphyton community assembly strongly depends on reach‐scale connectivity, which results in higher biomass accrual and community structure. These findings suggest that the mass effect paradigm is likely to be the principal metacommunity process shaping stream periphyton communities at the reach scale.
Field experiment conducted to determine the role of local and upstream propagules as drivers of stream periphyton communities. Community composition, structure, and functional guilds were assessed. Local colonisation was identified as the primary propagule source, leading to a mass effect.
