Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Wildfire influences species assemblage and habitat utilisation of boreal wildlife after more than a decade in northern Sweden
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Wildfire influences species assemblage and habitat utilisation of boreal wildlife after more than a decade in northern Sweden
Do you wish to request the book?
Wildfire influences species assemblage and habitat utilisation of boreal wildlife after more than a decade in northern Sweden
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Wildfire influences species assemblage and habitat utilisation of boreal wildlife after more than a decade in northern Sweden
2025
Overview
Fires can strongly change the vegetation structure and the availability of resources for wildlife, but fire suppression has long affected the natural role of fire in shaping boreal ecosystems in northern Europe. Recently, wildfires have increased in frequency, possibly due to global warming. In contrast to the boreal systems in North America, there have been few studies on responses of wildlife to wildfires in northern Europe. Based on the findings from North America, we predict that responses of wildlife to wildfire vary among wildlife species: where mammalian herbivores, such as moose Alces alces and mountain hare Lepus timidus, will be attracted to burnt areas following an increase in food availability, other species, such as reindeer Rangifer tarandus, are negatively impacted due to fire reducing their preferred food. We then tested our predictions by contrasting wildlife utilization of sites that burnt by wildfire in 2006 with nearby unburnt control sites in three areas in northern Sweden. To measure wildlife utilization, we used 72 camera traps, equally divided between the burnt and control sites, with two placement strategies: random and on wildlife trails. The cameras recorded 27 mammal and bird species during summer 2018. Species assemblage differed between burnt and control sites. Fieldfare Turdus pilaris used burnt sites more than control sites, while pine marten Martes martes and western capercaillie Tetrao urogallus used control sites more than burnt sites. We however did not find support for a positive effect of past forest fires on any of the observed wild mammals. We discuss how, due to the impact of forestry, forage‐rich habitat may not be as limiting in Scandinavia as in the North‐American context, potentially leading to recently burnt sites being less attractive to herbivores such as moose.
