Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Performance of hybrid poplar clones in short rotation coppice in Mediterranean environments: analysis of genotypic stability
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Performance of hybrid poplar clones in short rotation coppice in Mediterranean environments: analysis of genotypic stability
Do you wish to request the book?
Performance of hybrid poplar clones in short rotation coppice in Mediterranean environments: analysis of genotypic stability
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Performance of hybrid poplar clones in short rotation coppice in Mediterranean environments: analysis of genotypic stability
2014
Overview
Improving production in short rotation coppice (SRC) plantations requires, among other elements, a proper understanding of clonal performance. Genotypic stability over a range of environments is a factor of concern for breeding and recommendation purposes. Most common stability measures can be embedded in a mixed‐model framework accounting for interaction and heterocedasticity in genotype‐by‐environment tables. Data from nine hybrid poplars of different taxonomic background were tested in four Mediterranean sites under three agronomic practices (control, herbicide application, and supplementary fertilization) for total biomass (TB), stem biomass (SB), and branch biomass (BB) at the end of the first rotation. Stability models (stability variance, Finlay–Wilkinson and Eberhart–Russell) were compared, also allowing for the definition of groups of genotypes with distinct taxonomic backgrounds and a priori different variabilities. Results showed that genotype‐by‐environment (GE) interactions were associated with factors inherent to evaluation sites rather than to the agronomic practices tested. Depending on biomass fraction, regression models provided appropriate stability measures. Highly reactive clones to improving environmental conditions (e.g., ‘AF2’) tended to show the largest mean TB. However, this was not always the case, as clone ‘Monviso’ showed both intermediate reactivity (i.e., stable sensu Eberhart–Russell) and enhanced overall performance. The taxonomic group was relevant for explaining stability patterns for SB. The stability assessment for BB indicated different patterns in biomass allocation. Present findings point to the feasibility of either exploiting specific adaptation (in which case hybrid type may play a relevant role) or searching for broadly adapted, stable material exhibiting good performance in Mediterranean conditions.
