Journal Article

Texture and Friction Classification: Optical TacTip vs. Vibrational Piezoeletric and Accelerometer Tactile Sensors

Johnson, Chris, Shepherd, Dexter R., Philippides, Andrew, Husbands, Phil

2025

Overview

Tactile sensing is increasingly vital in robotics, especially for tasks like object manipulation and texture classification. Among tactile technologies, optical and electrical sensors are widely used, yet no rigorous direct comparison of their performance has been conducted. This paper addresses that gap by presenting a comparative study between a high-resolution optical tactile sensor (a modified TacTip) and a low-resolution electrical sensor combining accelerometers and piezoelectric elements. We evaluate both sensor types on two tasks: texture classification and coefficient of dynamic friction prediction. Various configurations and resolutions were explored, along with multiple machine learning classifiers to determine optimal performance. The optical sensor achieved 99.9% accuracy on a challenging texture dataset, significantly outperforming the electrical sensor, which reached 82%. However, for dynamic friction prediction, both sensors performed comparably, with only a 5~% accuracy difference. We also found that the optical sensor retained high classification accuracy even when image resolution was reduced to 25% of its original size, suggesting that ultra-high resolution is not essential. In conclusion, the optical sensor is the better choice when high accuracy is required. However, for low-cost or computationally efficient systems, the electrical sensor provides a practical alternative with competitive performance in some tasks.

• Publisher: MDPI AG,MDPI
• Subject: Accelerometers / Accuracy / Cameras / Classification / Comparative analysis / Costs / Datasets / electrical tactile sensing / Energy consumption / Friction / Machine learning / Morphology / optical tactile sensing / Robotics / sensor resolution / Sensors / Silicones / texture classification