MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study
A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study
A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study
A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study
Journal Article

A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study

2015
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose The incidence of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is highest in female patients; however, it is not apparent whether graft choice affects clinical results. The aim of this prospective randomised study was to evaluate clinical results of an ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon [bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB)] or hamstring graft (HS) in female patients. Methods Inclusion criteria were traumatic instability, no signs of osteoarthritis, no previous instability and no contralateral knee instability. Inclusion criteria were met in 150 patients, mean age 26 (17–47) years. Patients were randomised into two groups of 75 patients according to graft type; all had the same rehabilitation protocol. Tegner Lysholm knee score and stability were evaluated pre-operatively and one and two years postoperatively. The difference between groups was statistically evaluated using unpaired t test. Results Of the 150 patients, all completed one year follow-up; three were lost to follow-up at two years. There was no significant difference in functional scores and knee stability between groups. The HS group had significantly less anterior knee pain in the first six months postoperatively. Conclusion ACL reconstruction significantly improves clinical results and stability of the knee. Difference in Lysholm score and stability between groups was not significant. Neither group showed higher tendency to graft failure within two years. Graft choice for reconstruction in female patients should be surgeon specific and individualised, as both grafts studied achieved comparable results.