MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy – a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up
Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy – a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy – a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy – a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up
Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy – a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy – a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up
Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy – a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up
Journal Article

Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy – a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up

2015
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose To compare outcomes of phaco-canaloplasty (PC) and phaco-non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS) with a viscoelastic compound. Methods This study included 29 eyes after PC and 30 after PDS. Indications were uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and a cataract. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and number of medications were evaluated. Follow-up examinations were performed on days 1 and 7, and after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Complete and qualified success was an IOP ≤ 18 mmHg. Results At the 12-month follow-up, mean IOP decreased in the PC group from 19.0 ±6.9 mmHg to 12.6 ±2.7 mmHg, and in the PDS group, from 19.1 ±5.8 mmHg to 14.3 ±3.5 mmHg ( P  < 0.05). Both groups preoperatively and at 12 months showed no significant differences in IOP ( P  > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the number of medications used ( P  > 0.05). Complete and qualified success rates for both groups were 79.0 % and 76.9 % ( P  = 0.701). The most frequent postoperative PC complication was hyphema (58.0 %); for PDS, bleb fibrosis was most frequent (26.7 %). No PC patients required postoperative management. PDS patients required postoperative interventions 58.7 % of the time, including a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injection (58.7 %), suture lysis (48.3 %), and needling (27.6 %). Conclusions Both PC and PDS lead to an effective decrease in IOP on a short-term follow-up basis and demonstrate similar efficacy and safety profiles. PDS patients required additional procedures including 5-FU injections, suture lysis, or needling. PC patients required no additional procedures.