Journal Article

Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review

Asai, Masayasu, Therond, Olivier, PRIMAFF, Martin, Guillaume, Sarthou, Jean-Pierre, Duru, Michel, Moraine, Marc, Ryschawy, Julie, Magne, Marie-Angélina, AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (AGIR) ; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP) ; Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT), ANR-13-AGRO-0006,TATABOX,Transition agroécologique des territoires: une boite à outil pour concevoir et mettre en oeuvre une transition agroécologique des territoires agricoles avec les acteurs locaux., European Commission's Seventh Framework Program (Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Biotechnology)

2016

Overview

AbstractParadoxically, the number of crop–livestock farms is declining across Europe, despite the fact that crop-livestock farms are theoretically optimal to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To solve this issue, crop–livestock integration may be organized beyond the farm level. For instance, local groups of farmers can negotiate land-use allocation patterns and exchange materials such as manure, grain, and straw. Development of such a collective agricultural system raises questions, rarely documented in the literature, about how to integrate crops and livestock among farms, and the consequences, impacts, and conditions of integrating them. Here, we review the different forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level, their potential benefits, and the features of decision support systems (DSS) needed for the integration process. We identify three forms of crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: local coexistence, complementarity, and synergy, each with increasingly stronger temporal, spatial, and organizational coordination among farms. We claim that the forms of integration implemented define the nature, area, and spatial configuration of crops, grasslands, and animals in farms and landscapes. In turn, these configurations influence the provision of ecosystem services. For instance, we show that the synergy form of integration promotes soil fertility, erosion control, and field-level biological regulation services through organizational coordination among farmers and spatiotemporal integration between crops, grasslands, and animals. We found that social benefits of the synergy form of integration include collective empowerment of farmers. We claim that design of the complementarity and synergy forms of crop–livestock integration can best be supported by collective participatory workshops involving farmers, agricultural consultants, and researchers. In these workshops, spatialized simulation modeling of crop–livestock integration among farms is the basis for achieving the upscaling process involved in integrating beyond the farm level. Facilitators of these workshops have to pay attention to the consequences on governance and equity issues within farmers groups.

• Publisher: Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA,CCSD,Springer Paris,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Agricultural production / Agricultural research / Agriculture / Agronomy / Animals / Artificial intelligence / Biodiversity / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Complementarity / Configurations / consultants / Coordination / Crop production / Crops / Decision support systems / Ecosystem services / Ecosystems / Empowerment / Erosion control / Europe / Farmers / Farming systems / Farms / governance / Grasslands / Integration / Land use / landscapes / Life Sciences / Livestock / Livestock farming / Manures / researchers / Review Article / simulation models / social benefit / Soil erosion / Soil fertility / Soil management / Soil Science & Conservation / Specialization / straw / Sustainable agriculture / Sustainable Development / Trends / Workloads / Workshops
• ISBN: 0003847356000