Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Pneumonectomy for Unilateral Proximal Interruption of Pulmonary Artery: A Case Series from the Literature
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Pneumonectomy for Unilateral Proximal Interruption of Pulmonary Artery: A Case Series from the Literature
Do you wish to request the book?
Pneumonectomy for Unilateral Proximal Interruption of Pulmonary Artery: A Case Series from the Literature
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Pneumonectomy for Unilateral Proximal Interruption of Pulmonary Artery: A Case Series from the Literature
2023
Overview
Background: Unilateral proximal interruption of the pulmonary artery (UPIPA) is a rare congenital disease, and its optimal management remains undefined in the existing literature. The occasional necessity for pneumonectomy is still supported by limited evidence. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed search engine, focusing on UPIPA cases that received pneumonectomy. Thirty-one pertinent articles were selected and included in the analysis. A case reported from our institution was included in the analysis. Results: We found 25 adults and seven children affected by UPIPA who received an indication for pneumonectomy, plus an additional case that was reported by our institution. Among adult patients, the predominant indication was hemoptysis (57%), followed by suspected or confirmed lung cancer (23%). Approximately 46% of surgical procedures were classified as urgent or emergent. Postoperative complications were observed in 36% of cases, with no recorded mortality. In pediatric cases, pneumonectomy was primarily a life-saving intervention, performed urgently or emergently in 75% of instances. A possible late complication in pediatric patients involves a mediastinal shift leading to respiratory distress, which may be mitigated using an inflatable prosthesis. Conclusions: Pneumonectomy achieves complete resolution of UPIPA symptoms. In the adult population, its primary indication is hemoptysis, with procedures conducted in both elective and urgent/emergent settings. Despite a mortality rate of zero, a notable proportion of patients may experience postoperative complications. In pediatric cases, the clinical presentation varies more extensively, and pneumonectomy is typically reserved for life-threatening situations, emphasizing the need for careful patient selection.
