MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Impact of normocapnia vs. mild hypercapnia on prognosis after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Impact of normocapnia vs. mild hypercapnia on prognosis after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Impact of normocapnia vs. mild hypercapnia on prognosis after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Impact of normocapnia vs. mild hypercapnia on prognosis after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Impact of normocapnia vs. mild hypercapnia on prognosis after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Impact of normocapnia vs. mild hypercapnia on prognosis after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Impact of normocapnia vs. mild hypercapnia on prognosis after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal Article

Impact of normocapnia vs. mild hypercapnia on prognosis after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
To explore the impact of mild hypercapnia or normocapnia on the prognosis of patients after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) following cardiac arrest (CA). This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the guidelines in the PROSPERO report. Information was retrieved in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science to collect all publications in English from January 1, 2000, to March 1, 2024, involving post-CA with mild hypercapnia. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two authors using Review Manager 5.4 software. The primary/secondary outcomes, including overall or ICU mortality, were evaluated. 6 studies, including 4 observational studies, were ultimately enrolled in this study. A total of 19,025 patients were included in the studies, with 6899 receiving therapeutic mild hypercapnia and 12,126 maintaining normocapnia. Three studies focused on out-of-hospital patients, one study on in-hospital patients, one study on both in-hospital and out-of-hospital patients, and one study not specifying the type of CA. Compared to normocapnia, there was no significant difference in overall mortality among patients with mild hypercapnia (P = 0.51, OR = 1.13, 95 % CI: 0.93–1.38) and the proportion of patients with favorable neurological prognosis was not altered (OR:0.95, 95 % CI:0.80–1.14, P = 0.52). The overall ICU mortality rate was not significantly different between mild hypercapnia and normocapnia (OR:1.08,95 % CI:0.89–1.32, P = 0.42), and subgroup analysis showed that the results of randomized controlled trials and observational studies were consistent. The presented meta-analysis suggests that mild hypercapnia is not associated with improvements in overall survival, ICU survival, or neurological prognosis compared to normocapnia in patients with CA. This is the first meta-analysis specifically to compare the clinical outcome of CA with mild hypercapnia or normocapnia and find that mild hypercapnia may not be detrimental to the prognosis of patients after CA. It is unnecessary to control the mild hypercapnia intensively to normal range of PaCO2 in clinics.